Heartica: Heart Rate Monitor vs Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter
Heartica: Heart Rate Monitor
Faliane Ltd.
App Store
$17.8K/mo
~$213.4K/yr · 1.3M installs
VS
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter
Next Vision Limited
Google Play
$130.4K/mo
~$1.57M/yr · 1.4M installs
Revenue winner
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter wins
+633% vs other
Installs winner
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter wins
+7% vs other
MAU winner
Heartica: Heart Rate Monitor wins
+65% vs other
Rating winner
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter wins
+2% vs other
Why Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter earns roughly 7× more per month than Heartica: Heart Rate Monitor - $130.4K vs $17.8K.
- Premium pricing. Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter charges $19.99/mo vs Heartica: Heart Rate Monitor's $1.67/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Heartica: Heart Rate Monitor
vs
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$17.8K
▶
$130.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$213.4K
▶
$1.57M
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.3M
▶
1.4M
Monthly active users (est.)?
330K
◀
200K
App Store rating
4.57★
▶
4.68★
Total ratings
12K
▶
122K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$1.67
▶
$19.99
IAP tiers detected
9 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 16, 2025
- Last updated
- Jun 18, 2026
- File size
- 188.5 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 2.9.2
- Languages
- Arabic, Dutch, English, French, German, Hebrew +12 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 27, 2025
- Last updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.0.30
- Languages
- -
Heartica: Heart Rate Monitor trajectory
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Heartica: Heart Rate Monitor or Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter? v
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter earns about $130.4K per month, while Heartica: Heart Rate Monitor earns about $17.8K. That is a 7.3× revenue gap (~$112.7K more per month for Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Heartica: Heart Rate Monitor ≈ $213.4K/year, Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter ≈ $1.57M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Heartica: Heart Rate Monitor or Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter? v
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter leads with about 1.4M estimated downloads vs 1.3M for Heartica: Heart Rate Monitor - a 1.1× gap. Heartica: Heart Rate Monitor's App Store downloads are estimated from 12K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Heartica: Heart Rate Monitor and Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Heartica: Heart Rate Monitor and Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter offer? v
Heartica: Heart Rate Monitor: IAP range 9 tiers detected. Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter: IAP range $9.99 - $39.99 per item. Heartica: Heart Rate Monitor runs a "Subscription (~$1.67/mo)" monetization model; Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter runs "Subscription (~$19.99/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Heartica: Heart Rate Monitor or Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter? v
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Heartica: Heart Rate Monitor 12K ratings, Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter 675 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Heartica: Heart Rate Monitor vs Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $17.8K for Heartica: Heart Rate Monitor and $130.4K for Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Heartica: Heart Rate Monitor or Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.