Heartopia vs Magic Research
Heartopia
XD Entertainment Co., Ltd.
Google Play
$55.6K/mo
~$666.9K/yr · 9.9M installs
VS
Magic Research
Maticolotto
Google Play
$5.8K/mo
~$69.8K/yr · 122K installs
Revenue winner
Heartopia wins
+855% vs other
Installs winner
Heartopia wins
+8019% vs other
MAU winner
Heartopia wins
+4697% vs other
Rating winner
Magic Research wins
+53% vs other
Why Heartopia is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Heartopia earns roughly 10× more per month than Magic Research - $55.6K vs $5.8K.
- Subscription model. Heartopia runs a $6.24/mo subscription that compounds; Magic Research relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Heartopia has ~9.9M lifetime installs vs Magic Research's ~122K - 81.2× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Heartopia report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Heartopia
vs
Magic Research
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$55.6K
◀
$5.8K
Annual revenue (est.)
$666.9K
◀
$69.8K
Lifetime installs (est.)
9.9M
◀
122K
Monthly active users (est.)?
513K
◀
11K
App Store rating
3.05★
▶
4.67★
Total ratings
104K
◀
2K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$6.24
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Simulation
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 23, 2025
- Last updated
- Mar 10, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- 0.4.11
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Simulation
- Price
- USD3.99
- Released
- Jan 25, 2023
- Last updated
- Oct 17, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.15.12
- Languages
- -
Heartopia trajectory
Magic Research trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Heartopia or Magic Research? v
Heartopia earns about $55.6K per month, while Magic Research earns about $5.8K. That is a 9.5× revenue gap (~$49.8K more per month for Heartopia). Annual revenue: Heartopia ≈ $666.9K/year, Magic Research ≈ $69.8K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Heartopia or Magic Research? v
Heartopia leads with about 9.9M estimated downloads vs 122K for Magic Research - a 81.2× gap. Heartopia reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Magic Research reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Heartopia and Magic Research in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Simulation category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Heartopia and Magic Research offer? v
Heartopia: IAP range $0.39 - $99.99 per item. Magic Research: no IAP detected on the public listing. Heartopia runs a "Free game · IAP-driven (0 packs, ~$0.30/MAU)" monetization model; Magic Research runs "Paid app ($3.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Heartopia or Magic Research? v
Magic Research edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 3.1 (gap of 1.6 stars). Rating volume: Heartopia 3K ratings, Magic Research 385 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Heartopia vs Magic Research revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $55.6K for Heartopia and $5.8K for Magic Research are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Simulation) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Heartopia or Magic Research to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.