Heartopia vs Mini Metro
Heartopia
XD Entertainment Co., Ltd.
Google Play
$287.1K/mo
~$3.45M/yr · 9.9M installs
VS
Mini Metro
Dinosaur Polo Club
Google Play
$42.4K/mo
~$508.9K/yr · 3.6M installs
Revenue winner
Heartopia wins
+577% vs other
Installs winner
Heartopia wins
+176% vs other
MAU winner
Heartopia wins
+144% vs other
Rating winner
Mini Metro wins
+52% vs other
Why Heartopia is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Heartopia earns roughly 7× more per month than Mini Metro - $287.1K vs $42.4K.
- Subscription model. Heartopia runs a $6.24/mo subscription that compounds; Mini Metro relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Heartopia has ~9.9M lifetime installs vs Mini Metro's ~3.6M - 2.8× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Heartopia report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Heartopia
vs
Mini Metro
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$287.1K
◀
$42.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.45M
◀
$508.9K
Lifetime installs (est.)
9.9M
◀
3.6M
Monthly active users (est.)?
513K
◀
211K
App Store rating
3.06★
▶
4.64★
Total ratings
104K
◀
74K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$6.24
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Simulation
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 23, 2025
- Last updated
- Mar 10, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- 0.4.11
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Simulation
- Price
- USD0.99
- Released
- Oct 17, 2016
- Last updated
- Oct 8, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Heartopia trajectory
Mini Metro trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Heartopia or Mini Metro? v
Heartopia earns about $287.1K per month, while Mini Metro earns about $42.4K. That is a 6.8× revenue gap (~$244.7K more per month for Heartopia). Annual revenue: Heartopia ≈ $3.45M/year, Mini Metro ≈ $508.9K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Heartopia or Mini Metro? v
Heartopia leads with about 9.9M estimated downloads vs 3.6M for Mini Metro - a 2.8× gap. Heartopia reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Mini Metro reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Heartopia and Mini Metro in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Simulation category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Heartopia and Mini Metro offer? v
Heartopia: IAP range $0.39 - $99.99 per item. Mini Metro: no IAP detected on the public listing. Heartopia runs a "Subscription (~$6.24/mo)" monetization model; Mini Metro runs "Paid app ($0.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Heartopia or Mini Metro? v
Mini Metro edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 3.1 (gap of 1.6 stars). Rating volume: Heartopia 3K ratings, Mini Metro 3K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Heartopia vs Mini Metro revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $287.1K for Heartopia and $42.4K for Mini Metro are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Simulation) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Heartopia or Mini Metro to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.