HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor
Tantsissa
App Store
$358.7K/mo
~$4.30M/yr · 1.5M installs
VS
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
MacrosFirst, Inc.
App Store
$109.3K/mo
~$1.31M/yr · 642K installs
Revenue winner
HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor wins
+228% vs other
Installs winner
HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor wins
+133% vs other
MAU winner
HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor wins
+105% vs other
Rating winner
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker wins
+4% vs other
Why HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor earns roughly 3× more per month than MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker - $358.7K vs $109.3K.
- Bigger install base. HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor has ~1.5M lifetime installs vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker's ~642K - 2.3× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor
vs
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$358.7K
◀
$109.3K
Annual revenue (est.)
$4.30M
◀
$1.31M
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.5M
◀
642K
Monthly active users (est.)?
386K
◀
188K
App Store rating
4.68★
▶
4.86★
Total ratings
14K
▶
18K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$11.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
1 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- USD8.99
- Released
- Dec 7, 2015
- Last updated
- Oct 21, 2025
- File size
- 73.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.9
- Languages
- Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese +7 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 19, 2017
- Last updated
- Jun 28, 2026
- File size
- 185.9 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 2.1.679
- Languages
- English
HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor trajectory
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor earns about $358.7K per month, while MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker earns about $109.3K. That is a 3.3× revenue gap (~$249.4K more per month for HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor). Annual revenue: HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor ≈ $4.30M/year, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker ≈ $1.31M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor leads with about 1.5M estimated downloads vs 642K for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker - a 2.3× gap. HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor's App Store downloads are estimated from 14K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 18K ratings.
Are HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor and MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor and MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker offer? v
HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor: no IAP detected on the public listing. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker: IAP range 1 tiers detected. HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor runs a "Paid app ($8.99)" monetization model; MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker runs "Subscription (~$11.99/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor 14K ratings, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker 18K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $358.7K for HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor and $109.3K for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.