Historical War Tracker vs TripView
Historical War Tracker
Stefano van Poelgeest
Google Play
$920/mo
~$11.0K/yr · 4K installs
VS
TripView
TripView Pty Ltd
Google Play
$34.0K/mo
~$408.6K/yr · 474K installs
Revenue winner
TripView wins
+3601% vs other
Installs winner
TripView wins
+11014% vs other
MAU winner
TripView wins
+10258% vs other
Rating winner
TripView wins
+476% vs other
Why TripView is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- TripView earns roughly 37× more per month than Historical War Tracker - $34.0K vs $920.
- Bigger install base. TripView has ~474K lifetime installs vs Historical War Tracker's ~4K - 111.1× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. TripView sits at 4.76★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full TripView report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Historical War Tracker
vs
TripView
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$920
▶
$34.0K
Annual revenue (est.)
$11.0K
▶
$408.6K
Lifetime installs (est.)
4K
▶
474K
Monthly active users (est.)?
626.514
▶
65K
App Store rating
-
▶
4.76★
Total ratings
0
▶
20K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Travel & Local
- Price
- USD17.99
- Released
- Feb 28, 2018
- Last updated
- Aug 14, 2024
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- v5.6.0
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Travel & Local
- Price
- USD5.99
- Released
- Feb 2, 2011
- Last updated
- Apr 13, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 4.5.4
- Languages
- -
Historical War Tracker trajectory
TripView trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Historical War Tracker or TripView? v
TripView earns about $34.0K per month, while Historical War Tracker earns about $920. That is a 37.0× revenue gap (~$33.1K more per month for TripView). Annual revenue: Historical War Tracker ≈ $11.0K/year, TripView ≈ $408.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Historical War Tracker or TripView? v
TripView leads with about 474K estimated downloads vs 4K for Historical War Tracker - a 111.1× gap. Historical War Tracker reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play. TripView reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Historical War Tracker and TripView in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel & Local category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Historical War Tracker and TripView have in-app purchases? v
Historical War Tracker does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. TripView does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Historical War Tracker runs "Paid app ($17.99)", TripView runs "Paid app ($5.99)".
Which has better ratings, Historical War Tracker or TripView? v
TripView edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.8 stars). Rating volume: Historical War Tracker 0 ratings, TripView 110 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Historical War Tracker vs TripView revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $920 for Historical War Tracker and $34.0K for TripView are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel & Local) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Historical War Tracker or TripView to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.