Home Workout - No Equipments vs Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
Home Workout - No Equipments
Leap Health
App Store
$407.6K/mo
~$4.89M/yr · 4.9M installs
VS
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
Foodvisor
Google Play
$496.0K/mo
~$5.95M/yr · 10.2M installs
Revenue winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+22% vs other
Installs winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+108% vs other
MAU winner
Home Workout - No Equipments wins
+83% vs other
Rating winner
Home Workout - No Equipments wins
+6% vs other
Why Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Premium pricing. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter charges $27.91/mo vs Home Workout - No Equipments's $9.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter has ~10.2M lifetime installs vs Home Workout - No Equipments's ~4.9M - 2.1× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$407.6K
▶
$496.0K
Annual revenue (est.)
$4.89M
▶
$5.95M
Lifetime installs (est.)
4.9M
▶
10.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.4M
◀
788K
App Store rating
4.88★
◀
4.61★
Total ratings
109K
▶
151K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
▶
$27.91
IAP tiers detected
10 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 18, 2017
- Last updated
- Apr 23, 2026
- File size
- 306.7 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.50.0
- Languages
- Arabic, Danish, Dutch, English, French, German +15 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 8, 2018
- Last updated
- Mar 31, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 7.0.0-3
- Languages
- -
Home Workout - No Equipments trajectory
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Home Workout - No Equipments or Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter earns about $496.0K per month, while Home Workout - No Equipments earns about $407.6K. That is a 1.2× revenue gap (~$88.4K more per month for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Home Workout - No Equipments ≈ $4.89M/year, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter ≈ $5.95M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Home Workout - No Equipments or Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter leads with about 10.2M estimated downloads vs 4.9M for Home Workout - No Equipments - a 2.1× gap. Home Workout - No Equipments's App Store downloads are estimated from 109K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Home Workout - No Equipments and Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Home Workout - No Equipments and Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter offer? v
Home Workout - No Equipments: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $6.49 - $119.99 per item. Home Workout - No Equipments runs a "Subscription (~$5.83/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter runs "Subscription (~$27.91/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Home Workout - No Equipments or Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter? v
Home Workout - No Equipments edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Home Workout - No Equipments 109K ratings, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter 3K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Home Workout - No Equipments vs Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $407.6K for Home Workout - No Equipments and $496.0K for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Home Workout - No Equipments or Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
