Home Workout - No Equipments vs LADDER Strength Training Plans

Home Workout - No Equipments

Leap Health
App Store
$407.6K/mo
~$4.89M/yr · 4.9M installs
VS

LADDER Strength Training Plans

Ladder Technologies, Inc.
App Store
$2.25M/mo
~$27.01M/yr · 18.0M installs
Revenue winner LADDER Strength Training Plans wins +452% vs other
Installs winner LADDER Strength Training Plans wins +266% vs other
MAU winner LADDER Strength Training Plans wins +176% vs other
Rating winner LADDER Strength Training Plans wins +1% vs other

Why LADDER Strength Training Plans is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. LADDER Strength Training Plans earns roughly 6× more per month than Home Workout - No Equipments - $2.25M vs $407.6K.
  2. Premium pricing. LADDER Strength Training Plans charges $29.99/mo vs Home Workout - No Equipments's $9.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. LADDER Strength Training Plans has ~18.0M lifetime installs vs Home Workout - No Equipments's ~4.9M - 3.7× the funnel top.
  4. Charts placement. LADDER Strength Training Plans ranks #87 on the US grossing chart (the other app is unranked) - chart placement is a self-reinforcing flywheel.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full LADDER Strength Training Plans report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Home Workout - No Equipments
vs
LADDER Strength Training Plans
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$407.6K
▶
$2.25M
Annual revenue (est.)
$4.89M
▶
$27.01M
Lifetime installs (est.)
4.9M
▶
18.0M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.4M
▶
4.0M
App Store rating
4.88★
▶
4.95★
Total ratings
109K
▶
133K
US grossing rank
-
▶
#87
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
▶
$29.99
IAP tiers detected
10 tiers
◀
8 tiers

Home Workout - No Equipments

Leap Health
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Nov 18, 2017
Last updated
Apr 23, 2026
File size
306.7 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
1.50.0
Languages
Arabic, Danish, Dutch, English, French, German +15 more
View full Home Workout - No Equipments report →

LADDER Strength Training Plans

Ladder Technologies, Inc.
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Jun 23, 2020
Last updated
May 8, 2026
File size
221.9 MB
Content rating
9+
Version
4.7.1
Languages
English
View full LADDER Strength Training Plans report →

Home Workout - No Equipments trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

LADDER Strength Training Plans trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

Home Workout - No Equipments App Store page →LADDER Strength Training Plans App Store page →

Related comparisons

Cal AI Calorie Tracker iOS vs Home Workout No Equipments iOSHome Workout No Equipments iOS vs Calorie Counter Mynetdiary AndroidHome Workout No Equipments iOS vs Cal AI Food Calorie Tracker AndroidHome Workout No Equipments iOS vs Myfitnesspal Calorie Counter AndroidFitbit Health Fitness iOS vs Home Workout No Equipments iOSHome Workout No Equipments iOS vs Stompers Step Counter Friends iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, Home Workout - No Equipments or LADDER Strength Training Plans? v
LADDER Strength Training Plans earns about $2.25M per month, while Home Workout - No Equipments earns about $407.6K. That is a 5.5× revenue gap (~$1.84M more per month for LADDER Strength Training Plans). Annual revenue: Home Workout - No Equipments ≈ $4.89M/year, LADDER Strength Training Plans ≈ $27.01M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Home Workout - No Equipments or LADDER Strength Training Plans? v
LADDER Strength Training Plans leads with about 18.0M estimated downloads vs 4.9M for Home Workout - No Equipments - a 3.7× gap. Home Workout - No Equipments's App Store downloads are estimated from 109K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. LADDER Strength Training Plans's App Store downloads are estimated from 133K ratings.
Are Home Workout - No Equipments and LADDER Strength Training Plans in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Home Workout - No Equipments and LADDER Strength Training Plans offer? v
Home Workout - No Equipments: IAP range 10 tiers detected. LADDER Strength Training Plans: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Home Workout - No Equipments runs a "Subscription (~$5.83/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; LADDER Strength Training Plans runs "Subscription (~$15.00/mo, fitness-sub) · calibrated by US grossing rank #87". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Home Workout - No Equipments or LADDER Strength Training Plans? v
LADDER Strength Training Plans edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.9 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Home Workout - No Equipments 109K ratings, LADDER Strength Training Plans 133K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Home Workout - No Equipments vs LADDER Strength Training Plans revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $407.6K for Home Workout - No Equipments and $2.25M for LADDER Strength Training Plans are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Home Workout - No Equipments or LADDER Strength Training Plans to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.