Huckleberry: Baby & Child vs Monash FODMAP Diet

Huckleberry: Baby & Child

Huckleberry Labs Inc.
App Store
$759.5K/mo
~$9.11M/yr · 7.5M installs
VS

Monash FODMAP Diet

Monash University
App Store
$43.5K/mo
~$521.6K/yr · 204K installs
Revenue winner Huckleberry: Baby & Child wins +1647% vs other
Installs winner Huckleberry: Baby & Child wins +3569% vs other
MAU winner Huckleberry: Baby & Child wins +3761% vs other
Rating winner Huckleberry: Baby & Child wins +16% vs other

Why Huckleberry: Baby & Child is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Huckleberry: Baby & Child earns roughly 17× more per month than Monash FODMAP Diet - $759.5K vs $43.5K.
  2. Subscription model. Huckleberry: Baby & Child runs a $19.99/mo subscription that compounds; Monash FODMAP Diet relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Huckleberry: Baby & Child has ~7.5M lifetime installs vs Monash FODMAP Diet's ~204K - 36.7× the funnel top.
  4. More monetization surfaces. Huckleberry: Baby & Child runs 4 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Huckleberry: Baby & Child report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Huckleberry: Baby & Child
vs
Monash FODMAP Diet
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$759.5K
◀
$43.5K
Annual revenue (est.)
$9.11M
◀
$521.6K
Lifetime installs (est.)
7.5M
◀
204K
Monthly active users (est.)?
2.0M
◀
51K
App Store rating
4.92★
◀
4.23★
Total ratings
68K
◀
3K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
◀
0 tiers

Huckleberry: Baby & Child

Huckleberry Labs Inc.
App Store
Category
Medical
Price
Free
Released
Jul 4, 2017
Last updated
Jun 11, 2026
File size
202.2 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
v0.9.298
Languages
English
View full Huckleberry: Baby & Child report →

Monash FODMAP Diet

Monash University
App Store
Category
Medical
Price
USD7.99
Released
Dec 17, 2012
Last updated
Mar 12, 2026
File size
28.8 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
4.3.2
Languages
English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, NB +1 more
View full Monash FODMAP Diet report →

Huckleberry: Baby & Child trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Monash FODMAP Diet trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Related app pages

Huckleberry: Baby & Child App Store page →Monash FODMAP Diet App Store page →

Related comparisons

Huckleberry Baby Child iOS vs Squeezy iOSFreya Surge Timer iOS vs Huckleberry Baby Child iOSHuckleberry Baby Child iOS vs Monash University Fodmap Diet AndroidHuckleberry Baby Child iOS vs Muscle Trigger Point Anatomy AndroidHuckleberry Baby Child iOS vs Myair by Resmed AndroidHuckleberry Baby Child iOS vs Opioid Calculator Android

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, Huckleberry: Baby & Child or Monash FODMAP Diet? v
Huckleberry: Baby & Child earns about $759.5K per month, while Monash FODMAP Diet earns about $43.5K. That is a 17.5× revenue gap (~$716.0K more per month for Huckleberry: Baby & Child). Annual revenue: Huckleberry: Baby & Child ≈ $9.11M/year, Monash FODMAP Diet ≈ $521.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Huckleberry: Baby & Child or Monash FODMAP Diet? v
Huckleberry: Baby & Child leads with about 7.5M estimated downloads vs 204K for Monash FODMAP Diet - a 36.7× gap. Huckleberry: Baby & Child's App Store downloads are estimated from 68K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Monash FODMAP Diet's App Store downloads are estimated from 3K ratings.
Are Huckleberry: Baby & Child and Monash FODMAP Diet in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Medical category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Huckleberry: Baby & Child and Monash FODMAP Diet offer? v
Huckleberry: Baby & Child: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Monash FODMAP Diet: no IAP detected on the public listing. Huckleberry: Baby & Child runs a "Subscription (~$11.99/mo)" monetization model; Monash FODMAP Diet runs "Paid app ($7.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Huckleberry: Baby & Child or Monash FODMAP Diet? v
Huckleberry: Baby & Child edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.2 (gap of 0.7 stars). Rating volume: Huckleberry: Baby & Child 68K ratings, Monash FODMAP Diet 3K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Huckleberry: Baby & Child vs Monash FODMAP Diet revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $759.5K for Huckleberry: Baby & Child and $43.5K for Monash FODMAP Diet are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Medical) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Huckleberry: Baby & Child or Monash FODMAP Diet to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.