iliad vs PandaVPN: Fast Streaming VPN

PandaVPN: Fast Streaming VPN earns about $0 per month, while iliad earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: iliad ≈ $0/year, PandaVPN: Fast Streaming VPN ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

PandaVPN: Fast Streaming VPN leads with about 1.8M estimated downloads vs 400 for iliad - a 4502.3× gap. iliad's App Store downloads are estimated from 6 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. PandaVPN: Fast Streaming VPN's App Store downloads are estimated from 16K ratings.

Yes - both apps sit in the Utilities category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

iliad does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. PandaVPN: Fast Streaming VPN does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: iliad runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", PandaVPN: Fast Streaming VPN runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".

PandaVPN: Fast Streaming VPN edges ahead with ★ 4.2 vs ★ 3.7 (gap of 0.6 stars). Rating volume: iliad 6 ratings, PandaVPN: Fast Streaming VPN 16K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for iliad and $0 for PandaVPN: Fast Streaming VPN are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Utilities) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.