inDrive. Save on city rides vs Polarsteps
inDrive. Save on city rides
SUOL INNOVATIONS LTD
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 56.2M installs
VS
Polarsteps
Polarsteps B.V.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 684K installs
Revenue winnerTied
Installs winner
inDrive. Save on city rides wins
+8114% vs other
MAU winner
inDrive. Save on city rides wins
+3985% vs other
Rating winner
Polarsteps wins
+1% vs other
Why inDrive. Save on city rides is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Bigger install base. inDrive. Save on city rides has ~56.2M lifetime installs vs Polarsteps's ~684K - 82.1× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full inDrive. Save on city rides report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
inDrive. Save on city rides
vs
Polarsteps
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
=
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
=
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
56.2M
◀
684K
Monthly active users (est.)?
5.2M
◀
127K
App Store rating
4.84★
▶
4.88★
Total ratings
375K
◀
9K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 20, 2013
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- File size
- 523.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.174.0
- Languages
- AM, Arabic, BN, KM, English, French +17 more
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 23, 2015
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- File size
- 193.0 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 10.0.1
- Languages
- Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German +7 more
inDrive. Save on city rides trajectory
Polarsteps trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, inDrive. Save on city rides or Polarsteps? v
Polarsteps earns about $0 per month, while inDrive. Save on city rides earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: inDrive. Save on city rides ≈ $0/year, Polarsteps ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, inDrive. Save on city rides or Polarsteps? v
inDrive. Save on city rides leads with about 56.2M estimated downloads vs 684K for Polarsteps - a 82.1× gap. inDrive. Save on city rides's App Store downloads are estimated from 375K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Polarsteps's App Store downloads are estimated from 9K ratings.
Are inDrive. Save on city rides and Polarsteps in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do inDrive. Save on city rides and Polarsteps have in-app purchases? v
inDrive. Save on city rides does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Polarsteps does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: inDrive. Save on city rides runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Polarsteps runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, inDrive. Save on city rides or Polarsteps? v
Polarsteps edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: inDrive. Save on city rides 375K ratings, Polarsteps 9K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these inDrive. Save on city rides vs Polarsteps revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for inDrive. Save on city rides and $0 for Polarsteps are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare inDrive. Save on city rides or Polarsteps to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.