inKind vs 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送

inKind

inKind Cards, Inc.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 9.9M installs
VS

麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送

McDonald's (China) Co., Ltd.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 593K installs
Revenue winnerTied
Installs winner inKind wins +1569% vs other
MAU winner inKind wins +1583% vs other
Rating winner inKind wins +1% vs other

Why inKind is winning

Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Bigger install base. inKind has ~9.9M lifetime installs vs 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送's ~593K - 16.7× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full inKind report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

inKind
vs
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
=
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
=
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
9.9M
593K
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.2M
71K
App Store rating
4.91★
4.84★
Total ratings
90K
7K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

inKind

inKind Cards, Inc.
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Sep 29, 2016
Last updated
May 8, 2026
File size
100.6 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
6.50.0
Languages
English
View full inKind report →

麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送

McDonald's (China) Co., Ltd.
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Jan 25, 2016
Last updated
May 7, 2026
File size
111.9 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
7.0.33.0
Languages
English, Chinese
View full 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 report →

inKind trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, inKind or 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送? v
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 earns about $0 per month, while inKind earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: inKind ≈ $0/year, 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, inKind or 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送? v
inKind leads with about 9.9M estimated downloads vs 593K for 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 - a 16.7× gap. inKind's App Store downloads are estimated from 90K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送's App Store downloads are estimated from 7K ratings.
Are inKind and 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do inKind and 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 have in-app purchases? v
inKind does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: inKind runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, inKind or 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送? v
inKind edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: inKind 90K ratings, 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 7K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these inKind vs 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for inKind and $0 for 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare inKind or 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.