Intact Insurance: Mobile app vs Progressive

Progressive earns about $0 per month, while Intact Insurance: Mobile app earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: Intact Insurance: Mobile app ≈ $0/year, Progressive ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

Progressive leads with about 116.8M estimated downloads vs 89K for Intact Insurance: Mobile app - a 1307.5× gap. Intact Insurance: Mobile app's App Store downloads are estimated from 1K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Progressive's App Store downloads are estimated from 779K ratings.

Yes - both apps sit in the Finance category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

Intact Insurance: Mobile app does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Progressive does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Intact Insurance: Mobile app runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Progressive runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".

Progressive edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Intact Insurance: Mobile app 1K ratings, Progressive 779K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Intact Insurance: Mobile app and $0 for Progressive are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Finance) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.