Intake: Calorie Log vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Intake: Calorie Log
Tobias Bechtold
Google Play
$76/mo
~$914/yr · 978 installs
VS
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Stronger By Science Technologies LLC
Google Play
$102.0K/mo
~$1.22M/yr · 1.4M installs
Revenue winner
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins
+134137% vs other
Installs winner
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins
+140669% vs other
MAU winner
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins
+74594% vs other
Rating winner
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins
+484% vs other
Why MacroFactor - Macro Tracker is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- MacroFactor - Macro Tracker earns roughly 1342× more per month than Intake: Calorie Log - $102.0K vs $76.
- Premium pricing. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker charges $11.99/mo vs Intake: Calorie Log's $11.67/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker has ~1.4M lifetime installs vs Intake: Calorie Log's ~978 - 1407.7× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker sits at 4.84★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full MacroFactor - Macro Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Intake: Calorie Log
vs
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$76
▶
$102.0K
Annual revenue (est.)
$914
▶
$1.22M
Lifetime installs (est.)
978
▶
1.4M
Monthly active users (est.)?
239.61
▶
179K
App Store rating
-
▶
4.84★
Total ratings
0
▶
15K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$11.67
▶
$11.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- USD6.49
- Released
- Mar 3, 2026
- Last updated
- Jul 4, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.4.3
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 14, 2021
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone 10+
- Version
- 5.7.9
- Languages
- -
Intake: Calorie Log trajectory
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Intake: Calorie Log or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker earns about $102.0K per month, while Intake: Calorie Log earns about $76. That is a 1342.4× revenue gap (~$101.9K more per month for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker). Annual revenue: Intake: Calorie Log ≈ $914/year, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker ≈ $1.22M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Intake: Calorie Log or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker leads with about 1.4M estimated downloads vs 978 for Intake: Calorie Log - a 1407.7× gap. Intake: Calorie Log reports 500+ installs on Google Play. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Intake: Calorie Log and MacroFactor - Macro Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Intake: Calorie Log and MacroFactor - Macro Tracker offer? v
Intake: Calorie Log: IAP range $3.49 - $38.99 per item. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker: IAP range $9.99 - $89.99 per item. Intake: Calorie Log runs a "Paid app ($6.49)" monetization model; MacroFactor - Macro Tracker runs "Subscription (~$11.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Intake: Calorie Log or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.8 stars). Rating volume: Intake: Calorie Log 0 ratings, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Intake: Calorie Log vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $76 for Intake: Calorie Log and $102.0K for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Intake: Calorie Log or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.