Intake: Calorie Log vs FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home
Intake: Calorie Log
Tobias Bechtold
App Store
$64/mo
~$767/yr · 400 installs
VS
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home
Extramile Limited
Google Play
$54.1K/mo
~$649.7K/yr · 501K installs
Revenue winner
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home wins
+84503% vs other
Installs winner
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home wins
+125247% vs other
MAU winner
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home wins
+90455% vs other
Rating winner
Intake: Calorie Log wins
+13% vs other
Why FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home earns roughly 846× more per month than Intake: Calorie Log - $54.1K vs $64.
- Premium pricing. FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home charges $22.35/mo vs Intake: Calorie Log's $3.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home has ~501K lifetime installs vs Intake: Calorie Log's ~400 - 1253.5× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Intake: Calorie Log
vs
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$64
▶
$54.1K
Annual revenue (est.)
$767
▶
$649.7K
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
▶
501K
Monthly active users (est.)?
105.2
▶
95K
App Store rating
5.00★
◀
4.44★
Total ratings
1
▶
22K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$3.99
▶
$22.35
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- USD5.99
- Released
- Jan 20, 2026
- Last updated
- Jun 28, 2026
- File size
- 66.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.4.3
- Languages
- Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese +2 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 28, 2023
- Last updated
- May 11, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.27
- Languages
- -
Intake: Calorie Log trajectory
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Intake: Calorie Log or FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home? v
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home earns about $54.1K per month, while Intake: Calorie Log earns about $64. That is a 846.0× revenue gap (~$54.1K more per month for FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home). Annual revenue: Intake: Calorie Log ≈ $767/year, FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home ≈ $649.7K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Intake: Calorie Log or FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home? v
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home leads with about 501K estimated downloads vs 400 for Intake: Calorie Log - a 1253.5× gap. Intake: Calorie Log's App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Intake: Calorie Log and FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Intake: Calorie Log and FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home offer? v
Intake: Calorie Log: IAP range 2 tiers detected. FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home: IAP range $9.99 - $49.99 per item. Intake: Calorie Log runs a "Paid app ($5.99)" monetization model; FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home runs "Subscription (~$22.35/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Intake: Calorie Log or FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home? v
Intake: Calorie Log edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.6 stars). Rating volume: Intake: Calorie Log 1 ratings, FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Intake: Calorie Log vs FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $64 for Intake: Calorie Log and $54.1K for FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Intake: Calorie Log or FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.