Intake: Calorie Log vs Ivy: Processed Food Scanner
Intake: Calorie Log
Tobias Bechtold
App Store
$64/mo
~$767/yr · 400 installs
VS
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner
Ramzy Nanou
App Store
$29.7K/mo
~$356.6K/yr · 355K installs
Revenue winner
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner wins
+46330% vs other
Installs winner
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner wins
+88720% vs other
MAU winner
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner wins
+87369% vs other
Rating winner
Intake: Calorie Log wins
+5% vs other
Why Ivy: Processed Food Scanner is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Ivy: Processed Food Scanner earns roughly 464× more per month than Intake: Calorie Log - $29.7K vs $64.
- Subscription model. Ivy: Processed Food Scanner runs a $9.99/mo subscription that compounds; Intake: Calorie Log relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Ivy: Processed Food Scanner has ~355K lifetime installs vs Intake: Calorie Log's ~400 - 888.2× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Ivy: Processed Food Scanner report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Intake: Calorie Log
vs
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$64
▶
$29.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$767
▶
$356.6K
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
▶
355K
Monthly active users (est.)?
105.2
▶
92K
App Store rating
5.00★
◀
4.77★
Total ratings
1
▶
4K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
1 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- USD5.99
- Released
- Jan 20, 2026
- Last updated
- Apr 26, 2026
- File size
- 47.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.3.0
- Languages
- Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese +2 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 12, 2025
- Last updated
- Apr 15, 2026
- File size
- 57.3 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 2.3.7
- Languages
- English
Intake: Calorie Log trajectory
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Intake: Calorie Log or Ivy: Processed Food Scanner? v
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner earns about $29.7K per month, while Intake: Calorie Log earns about $64. That is a 464.3× revenue gap (~$29.7K more per month for Ivy: Processed Food Scanner). Annual revenue: Intake: Calorie Log ≈ $767/year, Ivy: Processed Food Scanner ≈ $356.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Intake: Calorie Log or Ivy: Processed Food Scanner? v
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner leads with about 355K estimated downloads vs 400 for Intake: Calorie Log - a 888.2× gap. Intake: Calorie Log's App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Ivy: Processed Food Scanner's App Store downloads are estimated from 4K ratings.
Are Intake: Calorie Log and Ivy: Processed Food Scanner in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Intake: Calorie Log and Ivy: Processed Food Scanner offer? v
Intake: Calorie Log: no IAP detected on the public listing. Ivy: Processed Food Scanner: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Intake: Calorie Log runs a "Paid app ($5.99)" monetization model; Ivy: Processed Food Scanner runs "Subscription (~$9.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Intake: Calorie Log or Ivy: Processed Food Scanner? v
Intake: Calorie Log edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Intake: Calorie Log 1 ratings, Ivy: Processed Food Scanner 4K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Intake: Calorie Log vs Ivy: Processed Food Scanner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $64 for Intake: Calorie Log and $29.7K for Ivy: Processed Food Scanner are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Intake: Calorie Log or Ivy: Processed Food Scanner to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.