Intake: Calorie Log vs Ntrix
Intake: Calorie Log
Tobias Bechtold
App Store
$64/mo
~$767/yr · 400 installs
VS
Ntrix
Paul Rivera
App Store
$80/mo
~$955/yr · 2K installs
Revenue winner
Ntrix wins
+25% vs other
Installs winner
Ntrix wins
+275% vs other
MAU winner
Ntrix wins
+249% vs other
Rating winner
Intake: Calorie Log wins
+500% vs other
Why Ntrix is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Bigger install base. Ntrix has ~2K lifetime installs vs Intake: Calorie Log's ~400 - 3.8× the funnel top.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Intake: Calorie Log
vs
Ntrix
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$64
▶
$80
Annual revenue (est.)
$767
▶
$955
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
▶
2K
Monthly active users (est.)?
105.2
▶
367.5
App Store rating
5.00★
◀
-
Total ratings
1
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- USD5.99
- Released
- Jan 20, 2026
- Last updated
- Apr 26, 2026
- File size
- 47.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.3.0
- Languages
- Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese +2 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- USD1.99
- Released
- May 7, 2026
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 5.9 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 1.0
- Languages
- English
Intake: Calorie Log trajectory
Ntrix trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Intake: Calorie Log or Ntrix? v
Ntrix earns about $80 per month, while Intake: Calorie Log earns about $64. That is a 1.3× revenue gap (~$16 more per month for Ntrix). Annual revenue: Intake: Calorie Log ≈ $767/year, Ntrix ≈ $955/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Intake: Calorie Log or Ntrix? v
Ntrix leads with about 2K estimated downloads vs 400 for Intake: Calorie Log - a 3.8× gap. Intake: Calorie Log's App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Ntrix's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings.
Are Intake: Calorie Log and Ntrix in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Intake: Calorie Log and Ntrix have in-app purchases? v
Intake: Calorie Log does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Ntrix does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Intake: Calorie Log runs "Paid app ($5.99)", Ntrix runs "Paid app ($1.99)".
Which has better ratings, Intake: Calorie Log or Ntrix? v
Intake: Calorie Log edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 5.0 stars). Rating volume: Intake: Calorie Log 1 ratings, Ntrix 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Intake: Calorie Log vs Ntrix revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $64 for Intake: Calorie Log and $80 for Ntrix are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Intake: Calorie Log or Ntrix to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.