Intake: Calorie Log vs SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker
Intake: Calorie Log
Tobias Bechtold
App Store
$64/mo
~$767/yr · 400 installs
VS
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker
Kim Yunhoo
App Store
$1.1K/mo
~$13.3K/yr · 10K installs
Revenue winner
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker wins
+1636% vs other
Installs winner
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker wins
+2450% vs other
MAU winner
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker wins
+2411% vs other
Rating winner
Intake: Calorie Log wins
+5% vs other
Why SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker earns roughly 17× more per month than Intake: Calorie Log - $1.1K vs $64.
- Subscription model. SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker runs a $3.99/mo subscription that compounds; Intake: Calorie Log relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker has ~10K lifetime installs vs Intake: Calorie Log's ~400 - 25.5× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker runs 3 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Intake: Calorie Log
vs
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$64
▶
$1.1K
Annual revenue (est.)
$767
▶
$13.3K
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
▶
10K
Monthly active users (est.)?
105.2
▶
3K
App Store rating
5.00★
◀
4.78★
Total ratings
1
▶
204
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$3.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
3 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- USD5.99
- Released
- Jan 20, 2026
- Last updated
- Apr 26, 2026
- File size
- 47.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.3.0
- Languages
- Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese +2 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 16, 2019
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 88.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.302
- Languages
- English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean +5 more
Intake: Calorie Log trajectory
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Intake: Calorie Log or SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker? v
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker earns about $1.1K per month, while Intake: Calorie Log earns about $64. That is a 17.4× revenue gap (~$1.0K more per month for SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker). Annual revenue: Intake: Calorie Log ≈ $767/year, SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker ≈ $13.3K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Intake: Calorie Log or SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker? v
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker leads with about 10K estimated downloads vs 400 for Intake: Calorie Log - a 25.5× gap. Intake: Calorie Log's App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 204 ratings.
Are Intake: Calorie Log and SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Intake: Calorie Log and SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker offer? v
Intake: Calorie Log: no IAP detected on the public listing. SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Intake: Calorie Log runs a "Paid app ($5.99)" monetization model; SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker runs "Subscription (~$12.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Intake: Calorie Log or SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker? v
Intake: Calorie Log edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Intake: Calorie Log 1 ratings, SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker 204 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Intake: Calorie Log vs SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $64 for Intake: Calorie Log and $1.1K for SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Intake: Calorie Log or SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.