Intake: Calorie Log vs Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner
Intake: Calorie Log
Tobias Bechtold
App Store
$64/mo
~$767/yr · 400 installs
VS
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner
Yuca
App Store
$662.0K/mo
~$7.94M/yr · 10.5M installs
Revenue winner
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins
+1034347% vs other
Installs winner
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins
+2626590% vs other
MAU winner
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins
+1947446% vs other
Rating winner
Intake: Calorie Log wins
+4% vs other
Why Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner earns roughly 10344× more per month than Intake: Calorie Log - $662.0K vs $64.
- Premium pricing. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner charges $10.00/mo vs Intake: Calorie Log's $3.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner has ~10.5M lifetime installs vs Intake: Calorie Log's ~400 - 26266.9× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$64
▶
$662.0K
Annual revenue (est.)
$767
▶
$7.94M
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
▶
10.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
105.2
▶
2.0M
App Store rating
5.00★
◀
4.82★
Total ratings
1
▶
96K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$3.99
▶
$10.00
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
◀
1 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- USD5.99
- Released
- Jan 20, 2026
- Last updated
- Jun 28, 2026
- File size
- 66.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.4.3
- Languages
- Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese +2 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 9, 2017
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- File size
- 204.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.1
- Languages
- English, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish
Intake: Calorie Log trajectory
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Intake: Calorie Log or Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner earns about $662.0K per month, while Intake: Calorie Log earns about $64. That is a 10344.5× revenue gap (~$662.0K more per month for Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner). Annual revenue: Intake: Calorie Log ≈ $767/year, Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner ≈ $7.94M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Intake: Calorie Log or Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner leads with about 10.5M estimated downloads vs 400 for Intake: Calorie Log - a 26266.9× gap. Intake: Calorie Log's App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner's App Store downloads are estimated from 96K ratings.
Are Intake: Calorie Log and Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Intake: Calorie Log and Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner offer? v
Intake: Calorie Log: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Intake: Calorie Log runs a "Paid app ($5.99)" monetization model; Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner runs "Subscription (~$10.00/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Intake: Calorie Log or Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Intake: Calorie Log edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Intake: Calorie Log 1 ratings, Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner 96K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Intake: Calorie Log vs Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $64 for Intake: Calorie Log and $662.0K for Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Intake: Calorie Log or Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
