Inter: Mobile Banking vs Toss
Inter: Mobile Banking
Banco Inter
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 2.3M installs
VS
Toss
Viva Republica
Google Play
$2.62M/mo
~$31.42M/yr · 43.9M installs
Revenue winner
Toss wins
+261856200% vs other
Installs winner
Toss wins
+1815% vs other
MAU winner
Toss wins
+420% vs other
Rating winner
Inter: Mobile Banking wins
+38% vs other
Why Toss is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Toss earns roughly 2618562× more per month than Inter: Mobile Banking - $2.62M vs $0.
- Subscription model. Toss runs a $9.86/mo subscription that compounds; Inter: Mobile Banking relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Toss has ~43.9M lifetime installs vs Inter: Mobile Banking's ~2.3M - 19.2× the funnel top.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Inter: Mobile Banking
vs
Toss
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$2.62M
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$31.42M
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.3M
▶
43.9M
Monthly active users (est.)?
987K
▶
5.1M
App Store rating
4.83★
◀
3.50★
Total ratings
21K
▶
252K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$9.86
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Finance
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 24, 2014
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- File size
- 884.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 26.10
- Languages
- English, Portuguese, Spanish
- Category
- Finance
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 11, 2014
- Last updated
- Jul 3, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Mature 17+
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Inter: Mobile Banking trajectory
Toss trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Inter: Mobile Banking or Toss? v
Toss earns about $2.62M per month, while Inter: Mobile Banking earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$2.62M more per month for Toss). Annual revenue: Inter: Mobile Banking ≈ $0/year, Toss ≈ $31.42M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Inter: Mobile Banking or Toss? v
Toss leads with about 43.9M estimated downloads vs 2.3M for Inter: Mobile Banking - a 19.2× gap. Inter: Mobile Banking's App Store downloads are estimated from 21K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Toss reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Inter: Mobile Banking and Toss in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Finance category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Inter: Mobile Banking and Toss offer? v
Inter: Mobile Banking: no IAP detected on the public listing. Toss: IAP range $0.29 - $334.99 per item. Inter: Mobile Banking runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Toss runs "Subscription (~$9.86/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Inter: Mobile Banking or Toss? v
Inter: Mobile Banking edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 3.5 (gap of 1.3 stars). Rating volume: Inter: Mobile Banking 21K ratings, Toss 159 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Inter: Mobile Banking vs Toss revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Inter: Mobile Banking and $2.62M for Toss are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Finance) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Inter: Mobile Banking or Toss to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.