iRISCO vs CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking

iRISCO

RISCO Group
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 0 installs
VS

CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking

Asana Rebel
Google Play
$5.6K/mo
~$67.2K/yr · 145K installs
Revenue winner CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking wins +559600% vs other
Installs winner CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking wins +14521700% vs other
MAU winner CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking wins +1190779% vs other
Rating winner CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking wins +371% vs other

Why CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking earns roughly 5596× more per month than iRISCO - $5.6K vs $0.
  2. Premium pricing. CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking charges $34.63/mo vs iRISCO's $21.49/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking has ~145K lifetime installs vs iRISCO's ~0 - 145217.0× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking sits at 3.71★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

iRISCO
vs
CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$5.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$67.2K
Lifetime installs (est.)
0
▶
145K
Monthly active users (est.)?
0
▶
12K
App Store rating
-
▶
3.71★
Total ratings
0
▶
2K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$21.49
▶
$34.63
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
◀
0 tiers

iRISCO

RISCO Group
App Store
Category
Lifestyle
Price
Free
Released
Oct 13, 2011
Last updated
Apr 7, 2026
File size
410.0 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
6.1.3
Languages
English
View full iRISCO report →

CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking

Asana Rebel
Google Play
Category
Lifestyle
Price
Free
Released
Mar 6, 2025
Last updated
Feb 23, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
2.0.1
Languages
-
View full CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking report →

iRISCO trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

iRISCO App Store page →CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking Play Store page →

Related comparisons

Irisco iOS vs Tinder Dating App Date Chat iOSBaby Led Weaning Recipes iOS vs Irisco iOSIrisco iOS vs Life360 Stay Connected Safe AndroidIrisco iOS vs Wyze Never Wonder AndroidIrisco iOS vs Design Space Diy With Cricut AndroidIrisco iOS vs Pixel PRO 2 Watch Face Android

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, iRISCO or CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking? v
CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking earns about $5.6K per month, while iRISCO earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$5.6K more per month for CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking). Annual revenue: iRISCO ≈ $0/year, CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking ≈ $67.2K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, iRISCO or CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking? v
CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking leads with about 145K estimated downloads vs 0 for iRISCO - a ∞× gap. iRISCO's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are iRISCO and CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Lifestyle category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do iRISCO and CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking offer? v
iRISCO: IAP range 8 tiers detected. CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking: IAP range $14.99 - $79.99 per item. iRISCO runs a "Subscription (~$5.42/mo)" monetization model; CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking runs "Subscription (~$34.63/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, iRISCO or CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking? v
CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 3.7 stars). Rating volume: iRISCO 0 ratings, CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking 14 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these iRISCO vs CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for iRISCO and $5.6K for CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Lifestyle) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare iRISCO or CalCountAI: Calorie Tracking to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.