iRISCO vs Philips Hue
iRISCO
RISCO Group
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 0 installs
VS
Philips Hue
Signify Netherlands B.V.
App Store
$375.2K/mo
~$4.50M/yr · 16.4M installs
Revenue winner
Philips Hue wins
+37520700% vs other
Installs winner
Philips Hue wins
+1642440000% vs other
MAU winner
Philips Hue wins
+144534720% vs other
Rating winner
Philips Hue wins
+468% vs other
Why Philips Hue is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Philips Hue earns roughly 375207× more per month than iRISCO - $375.2K vs $0.
- Aggressive pricing. Philips Hue undercuts at $0.99/mo vs $21.49/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Philips Hue has ~16.4M lifetime installs vs iRISCO's ~0 - 16424400.0× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Philips Hue sits at 4.68★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Philips Hue report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
iRISCO
vs
Philips Hue
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$375.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$4.50M
Lifetime installs (est.)
0
▶
16.4M
Monthly active users (est.)?
0
▶
1.4M
App Store rating
-
▶
4.68★
Total ratings
0
▶
109K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$21.49
◀
$0.99
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
◀
7 tiers
- Category
- Lifestyle
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 13, 2011
- Last updated
- May 14, 2026
- File size
- 412.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 6.2.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Lifestyle
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 28, 2016
- Last updated
- Jun 26, 2026
- File size
- 253.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.70.1
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French +13 more
iRISCO trajectory
Philips Hue trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, iRISCO or Philips Hue? v
Philips Hue earns about $375.2K per month, while iRISCO earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$375.2K more per month for Philips Hue). Annual revenue: iRISCO ≈ $0/year, Philips Hue ≈ $4.50M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, iRISCO or Philips Hue? v
Philips Hue leads with about 16.4M estimated downloads vs 0 for iRISCO - a ∞× gap. iRISCO's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Philips Hue's App Store downloads are estimated from 109K ratings.
Are iRISCO and Philips Hue in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Lifestyle category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do iRISCO and Philips Hue offer? v
iRISCO: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Philips Hue: IAP range 7 tiers detected. iRISCO runs a "Subscription (~$5.42/mo)" monetization model; Philips Hue runs "Subscription (~$7.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, iRISCO or Philips Hue? v
Philips Hue edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.7 stars). Rating volume: iRISCO 0 ratings, Philips Hue 109K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these iRISCO vs Philips Hue revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for iRISCO and $375.2K for Philips Hue are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Lifestyle) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare iRISCO or Philips Hue to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.