iRISCO vs Philips Hue
iRISCO
RISCO Group
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 0 installs
VS
Philips Hue
Signify Netherlands B.V.
Google Play
$89.1K/mo
~$1.07M/yr · 11.6M installs
Revenue winner
Philips Hue wins
+8912300% vs other
Installs winner
Philips Hue wins
+1155930700% vs other
MAU winner
Philips Hue wins
+40457575% vs other
Rating winner
Philips Hue wins
+453% vs other
Why Philips Hue is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Philips Hue earns roughly 89123× more per month than iRISCO - $89.1K vs $0.
- Aggressive pricing. Philips Hue undercuts at $11.34/mo vs $21.49/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Philips Hue has ~11.6M lifetime installs vs iRISCO's ~0 - 11559307.0× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Philips Hue sits at 4.53★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Philips Hue report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
iRISCO
vs
Philips Hue
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$89.1K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$1.07M
Lifetime installs (est.)
0
▶
11.6M
Monthly active users (est.)?
0
▶
405K
App Store rating
-
▶
4.53★
Total ratings
0
▶
158K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$21.49
◀
$11.34
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Lifestyle
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 13, 2011
- Last updated
- Apr 7, 2026
- File size
- 410.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 6.1.3
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Lifestyle
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 27, 2016
- Last updated
- Apr 25, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 5.66.0
- Languages
- -
iRISCO trajectory
Philips Hue trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, iRISCO or Philips Hue? v
Philips Hue earns about $89.1K per month, while iRISCO earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$89.1K more per month for Philips Hue). Annual revenue: iRISCO ≈ $0/year, Philips Hue ≈ $1.07M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, iRISCO or Philips Hue? v
Philips Hue leads with about 11.6M estimated downloads vs 0 for iRISCO - a ∞× gap. iRISCO's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Philips Hue reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are iRISCO and Philips Hue in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Lifestyle category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do iRISCO and Philips Hue offer? v
iRISCO: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Philips Hue: IAP range $0.99 - $129.99 per item. iRISCO runs a "Subscription (~$5.42/mo)" monetization model; Philips Hue runs "Subscription (~$11.34/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, iRISCO or Philips Hue? v
Philips Hue edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.5 stars). Rating volume: iRISCO 0 ratings, Philips Hue 11K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these iRISCO vs Philips Hue revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for iRISCO and $89.1K for Philips Hue are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Lifestyle) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare iRISCO or Philips Hue to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.