iRISCO vs SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker
iRISCO
RISCO Group
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 0 installs
VS
SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker
Skinbuddy
Google Play
$111/mo
~$1.3K/yr · 3K installs
Revenue winner
SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker wins
+11100% vs other
Installs winner
SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker wins
+322300% vs other
MAU winner
SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker wins
+36098% vs other
Rating winnerTied
Why SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker earns roughly 111× more per month than iRISCO - $111 vs $0.
- Premium pricing. SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker charges $21.89/mo vs iRISCO's $21.49/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker has ~3K lifetime installs vs iRISCO's ~0 - 3223.0× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
iRISCO
vs
SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$111
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$1.3K
Lifetime installs (est.)
0
▶
3K
Monthly active users (est.)?
0
▶
360.976
App Store rating
-
=
-
Total ratings
0
=
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$21.49
▶
$21.89
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Lifestyle
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 13, 2011
- Last updated
- Apr 7, 2026
- File size
- 410.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 6.1.3
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Lifestyle
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 30, 2025
- Last updated
- Apr 7, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.0
- Languages
- -
iRISCO trajectory
SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, iRISCO or SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker? v
SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker earns about $111 per month, while iRISCO earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$111 more per month for SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker). Annual revenue: iRISCO ≈ $0/year, SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker ≈ $1.3K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, iRISCO or SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker? v
SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker leads with about 3K estimated downloads vs 0 for iRISCO - a ∞× gap. iRISCO's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are iRISCO and SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Lifestyle category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do iRISCO and SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker offer? v
iRISCO: IAP range 8 tiers detected. SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker: IAP range $7.99 - $59.99 per item. iRISCO runs a "Subscription (~$5.42/mo)" monetization model; SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker runs "Subscription (~$21.89/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
How accurate are these iRISCO vs SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for iRISCO and $111 for SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Lifestyle) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare iRISCO or SkinBuddy: Ingredient Checker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.