iRISCO vs TP-Link Tapo
iRISCO
RISCO Group
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 0 installs
VS
TP-Link Tapo
TP-Link Systems Inc.
App Store
$46.7K/mo
~$560.8K/yr · 2.1M installs
Revenue winner
TP-Link Tapo wins
+4673700% vs other
Installs winner
TP-Link Tapo wins
+208065000% vs other
MAU winner
TP-Link Tapo wins
+24759735% vs other
Rating winner
TP-Link Tapo wins
+482% vs other
Why TP-Link Tapo is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- TP-Link Tapo earns roughly 46737× more per month than iRISCO - $46.7K vs $0.
- Aggressive pricing. TP-Link Tapo undercuts at $2.49/mo vs $21.49/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. TP-Link Tapo has ~2.1M lifetime installs vs iRISCO's ~0 - 2080650.0× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. TP-Link Tapo runs 10 IAP tiers vs 8 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full TP-Link Tapo report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
iRISCO
vs
TP-Link Tapo
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$46.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$560.8K
Lifetime installs (est.)
0
▶
2.1M
Monthly active users (est.)?
0
▶
248K
App Store rating
-
▶
4.82★
Total ratings
0
▶
19K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$21.49
◀
$2.49
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
▶
10 tiers
- Category
- Lifestyle
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 13, 2011
- Last updated
- May 14, 2026
- File size
- 412.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 6.2.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Lifestyle
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 16, 2019
- Last updated
- Jun 27, 2026
- File size
- 1.17 GB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.19.605
- Languages
- Arabic, Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +27 more
iRISCO trajectory
TP-Link Tapo trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, iRISCO or TP-Link Tapo? v
TP-Link Tapo earns about $46.7K per month, while iRISCO earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$46.7K more per month for TP-Link Tapo). Annual revenue: iRISCO ≈ $0/year, TP-Link Tapo ≈ $560.8K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, iRISCO or TP-Link Tapo? v
TP-Link Tapo leads with about 2.1M estimated downloads vs 0 for iRISCO - a ∞× gap. iRISCO's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. TP-Link Tapo's App Store downloads are estimated from 19K ratings.
Are iRISCO and TP-Link Tapo in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Lifestyle category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do iRISCO and TP-Link Tapo offer? v
iRISCO: IAP range 8 tiers detected. TP-Link Tapo: IAP range 10 tiers detected. iRISCO runs a "Subscription (~$5.42/mo)" monetization model; TP-Link Tapo runs "Subscription (~$5.83/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, iRISCO or TP-Link Tapo? v
TP-Link Tapo edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.8 stars). Rating volume: iRISCO 0 ratings, TP-Link Tapo 19K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these iRISCO vs TP-Link Tapo revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for iRISCO and $46.7K for TP-Link Tapo are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Lifestyle) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare iRISCO or TP-Link Tapo to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.