Ivy: Processed Food Scanner vs Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker

Ivy: Processed Food Scanner

Ramzy Nanou
App Store
$37.3K/mo
~$448.1K/yr · 446K installs
VS

Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker

Improvement Tech LLC
Google Play
$432.4K/mo
~$5.19M/yr · 4.2M installs
Revenue winner Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker wins +1058% vs other
Installs winner Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker wins +831% vs other
MAU winner Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker wins +418% vs other
Rating winner Ivy: Processed Food Scanner wins +3% vs other

Why Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker earns roughly 12× more per month than Ivy: Processed Food Scanner - $432.4K vs $37.3K.
  2. Premium pricing. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker charges $24.48/mo vs Ivy: Processed Food Scanner's $9.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker has ~4.2M lifetime installs vs Ivy: Processed Food Scanner's ~446K - 9.3× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Ivy: Processed Food Scanner
vs
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$37.3K
$432.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$448.1K
$5.19M
Lifetime installs (est.)
446K
4.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
116K
598K
App Store rating
4.77★
4.61★
Total ratings
6K
271K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
$24.48
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
0 tiers

Ivy: Processed Food Scanner

Ramzy Nanou
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Jan 12, 2025
Last updated
Jun 22, 2026
File size
64.8 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
2.3.8
Languages
English
View full Ivy: Processed Food Scanner report →

Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker

Improvement Tech LLC
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Jul 29, 2024
Last updated
Jun 26, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
26.24.0
Languages
-
View full Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker report →

Ivy: Processed Food Scanner trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

FAQ

Which makes more money, Ivy: Processed Food Scanner or Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker? v
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker earns about $432.4K per month, while Ivy: Processed Food Scanner earns about $37.3K. That is a 11.6× revenue gap (~$395.0K more per month for Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Ivy: Processed Food Scanner ≈ $448.1K/year, Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker ≈ $5.19M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Ivy: Processed Food Scanner or Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker? v
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker leads with about 4.2M estimated downloads vs 446K for Ivy: Processed Food Scanner - a 9.3× gap. Ivy: Processed Food Scanner's App Store downloads are estimated from 6K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Ivy: Processed Food Scanner and Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Ivy: Processed Food Scanner and Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker offer? v
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker: IAP range $9.99 - $59.99 per item. Ivy: Processed Food Scanner runs a "Subscription (~$9.99/mo)" monetization model; Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker runs "Subscription (~$24.48/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Ivy: Processed Food Scanner or Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker? v
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Ivy: Processed Food Scanner 6K ratings, Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Ivy: Processed Food Scanner vs Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $37.3K for Ivy: Processed Food Scanner and $432.4K for Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Ivy: Processed Food Scanner or Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.