カラオケ予約-キョクナビJOYSOUND vs Loops By CDUB
カラオケ予約-キョクナビJOYSOUND
XING INC.
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 1.9M installs
VS
Loops By CDUB
The C-Dub Brand
Google Play
$19.4K/mo
~$232.2K/yr · 109K installs
Revenue winner
Loops By CDUB wins
+1935300% vs other
Installs winner
カラオケ予約-キョクナビJOYSOUND wins
+1624% vs other
MAU winner
カラオケ予約-キョクナビJOYSOUND wins
+1059% vs other
Rating winner
カラオケ予約-キョクナビJOYSOUND wins
+2% vs other
Why Loops By CDUB is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Loops By CDUB earns roughly 19353× more per month than カラオケ予約-キョクナビJOYSOUND - $19.4K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Loops By CDUB runs a $44.70/mo subscription that compounds; カラオケ予約-キョクナビJOYSOUND relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Loops By CDUB report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$19.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$232.2K
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.9M
◀
109K
Monthly active users (est.)?
371K
◀
32K
App Store rating
3.57★
◀
3.51★
Total ratings
6K
◀
515
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$44.70
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Music & Audio
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 4, 2012
- Last updated
- Feb 27, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 5.0.13
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Music & Audio
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 2, 2017
- Last updated
- May 8, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 5.0
- Languages
- -
カラオケ予約-キョクナビJOYSOUND trajectory
Loops By CDUB trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, カラオケ予約-キョクナビJOYSOUND or Loops By CDUB? v
Loops By CDUB earns about $19.4K per month, while カラオケ予約-キョクナビJOYSOUND earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$19.4K more per month for Loops By CDUB). Annual revenue: カラオケ予約-キョクナビJOYSOUND ≈ $0/year, Loops By CDUB ≈ $232.2K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, カラオケ予約-キョクナビJOYSOUND or Loops By CDUB? v
カラオケ予約-キョクナビJOYSOUND leads with about 1.9M estimated downloads vs 109K for Loops By CDUB - a 17.2× gap. カラオケ予約-キョクナビJOYSOUND reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Loops By CDUB reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are カラオケ予約-キョクナビJOYSOUND and Loops By CDUB in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Music & Audio category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do カラオケ予約-キョクナビJOYSOUND and Loops By CDUB offer? v
カラオケ予約-キョクナビJOYSOUND: no IAP detected on the public listing. Loops By CDUB: IAP range $9.99 - $199.99 per item. カラオケ予約-キョクナビJOYSOUND runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Loops By CDUB runs "Subscription (~$44.70/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, カラオケ予約-キョクナビJOYSOUND or Loops By CDUB? v
カラオケ予約-キョクナビJOYSOUND edges ahead with ★ 3.6 vs ★ 3.5 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: カラオケ予約-キョクナビJOYSOUND 4 ratings, Loops By CDUB 195 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these カラオケ予約-キョクナビJOYSOUND vs Loops By CDUB revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for カラオケ予約-キョクナビJOYSOUND and $19.4K for Loops By CDUB are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Music & Audio) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare カラオケ予約-キョクナビJOYSOUND or Loops By CDUB to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
