Kimi vs PDF Reader: View All PDFs
Kimi
Moonshot AI
Google Play
$259.5K/mo
~$3.11M/yr · 4.0M installs
VS
PDF Reader: View All PDFs
Cao Thanh Long
Google Play
$17.7K/mo
~$212.5K/yr · 1.1M installs
Revenue winner
Kimi wins
+1365% vs other
Installs winner
Kimi wins
+273% vs other
MAU winner
Kimi wins
+287% vs other
Rating winner
Kimi wins
+16% vs other
Why Kimi is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Kimi earns roughly 15× more per month than PDF Reader: View All PDFs - $259.5K vs $17.7K.
- Premium pricing. Kimi charges $84.05/mo vs PDF Reader: View All PDFs's $22.35/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Kimi has ~4.0M lifetime installs vs PDF Reader: View All PDFs's ~1.1M - 3.7× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Kimi sits at 4.08★ vs 3.52★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$259.5K
◀
$17.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.11M
◀
$212.5K
Lifetime installs (est.)
4.0M
◀
1.1M
Monthly active users (est.)?
227K
◀
59K
App Store rating
4.08★
◀
3.52★
Total ratings
22K
◀
2K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$84.05
◀
$22.35
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Tools
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 27, 2025
- Last updated
- Apr 27, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- 2.6.9
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Tools
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 12, 2025
- Last updated
- Apr 1, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.1.8
- Languages
- -
Kimi trajectory
PDF Reader: View All PDFs trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Kimi or PDF Reader: View All PDFs? v
Kimi earns about $259.5K per month, while PDF Reader: View All PDFs earns about $17.7K. That is a 14.7× revenue gap (~$241.8K more per month for Kimi). Annual revenue: Kimi ≈ $3.11M/year, PDF Reader: View All PDFs ≈ $212.5K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Kimi or PDF Reader: View All PDFs? v
Kimi leads with about 4.0M estimated downloads vs 1.1M for PDF Reader: View All PDFs - a 3.7× gap. Kimi reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. PDF Reader: View All PDFs reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Kimi and PDF Reader: View All PDFs in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Tools category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Kimi and PDF Reader: View All PDFs offer? v
Kimi: IAP range $18.99 - $372.00 per item. PDF Reader: View All PDFs: IAP range $9.99 - $49.99 per item. Kimi runs a "Subscription (~$84.05/mo)" monetization model; PDF Reader: View All PDFs runs "Subscription (~$22.35/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Kimi or PDF Reader: View All PDFs? v
Kimi edges ahead with ★ 4.1 vs ★ 3.5 (gap of 0.6 stars). Rating volume: Kimi 616 ratings, PDF Reader: View All PDFs 38 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Kimi vs PDF Reader: View All PDFs revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $259.5K for Kimi and $17.7K for PDF Reader: View All PDFs are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Tools) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Kimi or PDF Reader: View All PDFs to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
