Kino - Pro Video Camera vs PhotoPills

Kino - Pro Video Camera earns about $39.6K per month, while PhotoPills earns about $35.1K. That is a 1.1× revenue gap (~$4.5K more per month for Kino - Pro Video Camera). Annual revenue: Kino - Pro Video Camera ≈ $475.2K/year, PhotoPills ≈ $420.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

Kino - Pro Video Camera leads with about 149K estimated downloads vs 120K for PhotoPills - a 1.2× gap. Kino - Pro Video Camera's App Store downloads are estimated from 2K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. PhotoPills's App Store downloads are estimated from 1K ratings.

Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

Kino - Pro Video Camera does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. PhotoPills does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Kino - Pro Video Camera runs "Paid app ($9.99)", PhotoPills runs "Paid app ($10.99)".

Kino - Pro Video Camera edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Kino - Pro Video Camera 2K ratings, PhotoPills 1K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $39.6K for Kino - Pro Video Camera and $35.1K for PhotoPills are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.