LA Fitness Mobile vs Lazy exercise at home

Lazy exercise at home earns about $444.1K per month, while LA Fitness Mobile earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$444.1K more per month for Lazy exercise at home). Annual revenue: LA Fitness Mobile ≈ $0/year, Lazy exercise at home ≈ $5.33M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

Lazy exercise at home leads with about 5.7M estimated downloads vs 4.2M for LA Fitness Mobile - a 1.4× gap. LA Fitness Mobile reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Lazy exercise at home reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play.

Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

LA Fitness Mobile does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Lazy exercise at home does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: LA Fitness Mobile runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Lazy exercise at home runs "Subscription (~$12.00/mo, fitness-sub)".

Lazy exercise at home edges ahead with ★ 4.0 vs ★ 3.1 (gap of 0.9 stars). Rating volume: LA Fitness Mobile 6K ratings, Lazy exercise at home 854 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for LA Fitness Mobile and $444.1K for Lazy exercise at home are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.