Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker vs PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker
Lifesum
Google Play
$1.63M/mo
~$19.54M/yr · 29.3M installs
VS
PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理
ライフログテクノロジー株式会社
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 666K installs
Revenue winner
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+162823100% vs other
Installs winner
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+4309% vs other
MAU winner
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+1937% vs other
Rating winner
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+10% vs other
Why Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker earns roughly 1628231× more per month than PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 - $1.63M vs $0.
- Subscription model. Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker runs a $19.97/mo subscription that compounds; PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker has ~29.3M lifetime installs vs PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理's ~666K - 44.1× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker sits at 4.39★ vs 4.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker
vs
PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.63M
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$19.54M
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
29.3M
◀
666K
Monthly active users (est.)?
2.5M
◀
122K
App Store rating
4.39★
◀
4.00★
Total ratings
374K
◀
6K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.97
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 16, 2011
- Last updated
- Apr 8, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 14, 2017
- Last updated
- Apr 16, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- 2.5.13
- Languages
- -
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker trajectory
PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker or PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理? v
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker earns about $1.63M per month, while PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$1.63M more per month for Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker ≈ $19.54M/year, PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker or PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理? v
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker leads with about 29.3M estimated downloads vs 666K for PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 - a 44.1× gap. Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play. PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker and PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker and PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 offer? v
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker: IAP range $3.99 - $99.99 per item. PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理: no IAP detected on the public listing. Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$19.97/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker or PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理? v
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.4 vs ★ 4.0 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker 14K ratings, PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 4 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker vs PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.63M for Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker and $0 for PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker or PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.