Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker
Lifesum
Google Play
$1.63M/mo
~$19.62M/yr · 29.4M installs
VS
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Stronger By Science Technologies LLC
Google Play
$102.0K/mo
~$1.22M/yr · 1.4M installs
Revenue winner
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+1503% vs other
Installs winner
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+2039% vs other
MAU winner
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+1299% vs other
Rating winner
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins
+10% vs other
Why Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker earns roughly 16× more per month than MacroFactor - Macro Tracker - $1.63M vs $102.0K.
- Premium pricing. Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker charges $19.97/mo vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker's $11.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker has ~29.4M lifetime installs vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker's ~1.4M - 21.4× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker
vs
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.63M
◀
$102.0K
Annual revenue (est.)
$19.62M
◀
$1.22M
Lifetime installs (est.)
29.4M
◀
1.4M
Monthly active users (est.)?
2.5M
◀
179K
App Store rating
4.40★
▶
4.84★
Total ratings
376K
◀
15K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.97
◀
$11.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 16, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 14, 2021
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone 10+
- Version
- 5.7.9
- Languages
- -
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker trajectory
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker earns about $1.63M per month, while MacroFactor - Macro Tracker earns about $102.0K. That is a 16.0× revenue gap (~$1.53M more per month for Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker ≈ $19.62M/year, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker ≈ $1.22M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker leads with about 29.4M estimated downloads vs 1.4M for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker - a 21.4× gap. Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker and MacroFactor - Macro Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker and MacroFactor - Macro Tracker offer? v
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker: IAP range $3.99 - $99.99 per item. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker: IAP range $9.99 - $89.99 per item. Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$19.97/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; MacroFactor - Macro Tracker runs "Subscription (~$11.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker 14K ratings, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.63M for Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker and $102.0K for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.