LIMBO vs Sitckman Bravo Collection

LIMBO

Playdead
Google Play
$171.3K/mo
~$2.06M/yr · 3.6M installs
VS

Sitckman Bravo Collection

LevelUpGames
Google Play
$266/mo
~$3.2K/yr · 2K installs
Revenue winner LIMBO wins +64313% vs other
Installs winner LIMBO wins +225529% vs other
MAU winner LIMBO wins +110803% vs other
Rating winner Sitckman Bravo Collection wins +7% vs other

Why LIMBO is winning

Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. LIMBO earns roughly 644× more per month than Sitckman Bravo Collection - $171.3K vs $266.
  2. Bigger install base. LIMBO has ~3.6M lifetime installs vs Sitckman Bravo Collection's ~2K - 2256.3× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full LIMBO report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

LIMBO
vs
Sitckman Bravo Collection
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$171.3K
$266
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.06M
$3.2K
Lifetime installs (est.)
3.6M
2K
Monthly active users (est.)?
208K
187.148
App Store rating
4.38★
4.69★
Total ratings
82K
84
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

LIMBO

Playdead
Google Play
Category
Adventure
Price
USD3.99
Released
Feb 11, 2015
Last updated
Apr 9, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Teen
Version
1.23
Languages
-
View full LIMBO report →

Sitckman Bravo Collection

LevelUpGames
Google Play
Category
Adventure
Price
USD13.99
Released
Mar 22, 2023
Last updated
Aug 28, 2025
File size
-
Content rating
Teen
Version
1.0
Languages
-
View full Sitckman Bravo Collection report →

LIMBO trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Sitckman Bravo Collection trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, LIMBO or Sitckman Bravo Collection? v
LIMBO earns about $171.3K per month, while Sitckman Bravo Collection earns about $266. That is a 644.1× revenue gap (~$171.1K more per month for LIMBO). Annual revenue: LIMBO ≈ $2.06M/year, Sitckman Bravo Collection ≈ $3.2K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, LIMBO or Sitckman Bravo Collection? v
LIMBO leads with about 3.6M estimated downloads vs 2K for Sitckman Bravo Collection - a 2256.3× gap. LIMBO reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Sitckman Bravo Collection reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are LIMBO and Sitckman Bravo Collection in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Adventure category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do LIMBO and Sitckman Bravo Collection have in-app purchases? v
LIMBO does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Sitckman Bravo Collection does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: LIMBO runs "Paid app ($3.99)", Sitckman Bravo Collection runs "Paid app ($13.99)".
Which has better ratings, LIMBO or Sitckman Bravo Collection? v
Sitckman Bravo Collection edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: LIMBO 4K ratings, Sitckman Bravo Collection 27 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these LIMBO vs Sitckman Bravo Collection revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $171.3K for LIMBO and $266 for Sitckman Bravo Collection are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Adventure) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare LIMBO or Sitckman Bravo Collection to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.