Link to Windows vs Claude by Anthropic

Link to Windows

Microsoft Corporation
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 1.4M installs
VS

Claude by Anthropic

Anthropic PBC
Google Play
$9.21M/mo
~$110.57M/yr · 29.8M installs
Revenue winner Claude by Anthropic wins +921424200% vs other
Installs winner Claude by Anthropic wins +1967% vs other
MAU winner Claude by Anthropic wins +1242% vs other
Rating winner Claude by Anthropic wins +13% vs other

Why Claude by Anthropic is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Claude by Anthropic earns roughly 9214242× more per month than Link to Windows - $9.21M vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. Claude by Anthropic runs a $70.71/mo subscription that compounds; Link to Windows relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Claude by Anthropic has ~29.8M lifetime installs vs Link to Windows's ~1.4M - 20.7× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. Claude by Anthropic sits at 4.53★ vs 4.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Claude by Anthropic report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Link to Windows
vs
Claude by Anthropic
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$9.21M
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$110.57M
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.4M
▶
29.8M
Monthly active users (est.)?
411K
▶
5.5M
App Store rating
4.00★
▶
4.53★
Total ratings
13K
▶
429K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$70.71
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

Link to Windows

Microsoft Corporation
App Store
Category
Productivity
Price
Free
Released
Feb 28, 2023
Last updated
Apr 27, 2026
File size
99.9 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
1.26041.21
Languages
Arabic, Catalan, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch +27 more
View full Link to Windows report →

Claude by Anthropic

Anthropic PBC
Google Play
Category
Productivity
Price
Free
Released
Jul 11, 2024
Last updated
May 9, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Teen
Version
1.260430.10
Languages
-
View full Claude by Anthropic report →

Link to Windows trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Claude by Anthropic trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

Link to Windows App Store page →Claude by Anthropic Play Store page →

Related comparisons

ChatGPT iOS vs Link to Windows Lfbiq iOSLink to Windows Lfbiq iOS vs Hotschedules Logbook AndroidLink to Windows Lfbiq iOS vs Site Audit PRO iOSLink to Windows Lfbiq iOS vs Google One AndroidLink to Windows Lfbiq iOS vs Microsoft Onedrive AndroidLink to Windows Lfbiq iOS vs Grok AI Chat Video Android

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, Link to Windows or Claude by Anthropic? v
Claude by Anthropic earns about $9.21M per month, while Link to Windows earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$9.21M more per month for Claude by Anthropic). Annual revenue: Link to Windows ≈ $0/year, Claude by Anthropic ≈ $110.57M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Link to Windows or Claude by Anthropic? v
Claude by Anthropic leads with about 29.8M estimated downloads vs 1.4M for Link to Windows - a 20.7× gap. Link to Windows's App Store downloads are estimated from 13K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Claude by Anthropic reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Link to Windows and Claude by Anthropic in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Productivity category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Link to Windows and Claude by Anthropic offer? v
Link to Windows: no IAP detected on the public listing. Claude by Anthropic: IAP range $20.00 - $250.00 per item. Link to Windows runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Claude by Anthropic runs "Subscription (~$70.71/mo, ai)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Link to Windows or Claude by Anthropic? v
Claude by Anthropic edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 4.0 (gap of 0.5 stars). Rating volume: Link to Windows 13K ratings, Claude by Anthropic 10K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Link to Windows vs Claude by Anthropic revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Link to Windows and $9.21M for Claude by Anthropic are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Productivity) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Link to Windows or Claude by Anthropic to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.