List Maker vs Microsoft To Do: Lists & Tasks

Microsoft To Do: Lists & Tasks earns about $0 per month, while List Maker earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: List Maker ≈ $0/year, Microsoft To Do: Lists & Tasks ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

Microsoft To Do: Lists & Tasks leads with about 29.3M estimated downloads vs 130K for List Maker - a 225.3× gap. List Maker reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play. Microsoft To Do: Lists & Tasks reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.

Yes - both apps sit in the Productivity category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

List Maker does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Microsoft To Do: Lists & Tasks does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: List Maker runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Microsoft To Do: Lists & Tasks runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".

Microsoft To Do: Lists & Tasks edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.2 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: List Maker 157 ratings, Microsoft To Do: Lists & Tasks 13K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for List Maker and $0 for Microsoft To Do: Lists & Tasks are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Productivity) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.