Loop ◈ vs Magic Sort!
Loop ◈
TEAM CHILI S.C.
App Store
$8/mo
~$94/yr · 600 installs
VS
Magic Sort!
Grand Games A.Ş.
App Store
$1.25M/mo
~$14.99M/yr · 62.9M installs
Revenue winner
Magic Sort! wins
+15617775% vs other
Installs winner
Magic Sort! wins
+10483050% vs other
MAU winner
Magic Sort! wins
+5517347% vs other
Rating winner
Magic Sort! wins
+18% vs other
Why Magic Sort! is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Magic Sort! earns roughly 156179× more per month than Loop ◈ - $1.25M vs $8.
- Subscription model. Magic Sort! runs a $21.68/mo subscription that compounds; Loop ◈ relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Magic Sort! has ~62.9M lifetime installs vs Loop ◈'s ~600 - 104831.5× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Magic Sort! runs 10 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Magic Sort! report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$8
▶
$1.25M
Annual revenue (est.)
$94
▶
$14.99M
Lifetime installs (est.)
600
▶
62.9M
Monthly active users (est.)?
114
▶
6.3M
App Store rating
4.00★
▶
4.73★
Total ratings
12
▶
419K
US grossing rank
-
▶
#73
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$21.68
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
10 tiers
- Category
- Games
- Price
- USD0.49
- Released
- May 28, 2022
- Last updated
- Apr 5, 2026
- File size
- 78.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.0.26
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Games
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 28, 2024
- Last updated
- May 8, 2026
- File size
- 552.9 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 25.42
- Languages
- Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese +5 more
Loop ◈ trajectory
Magic Sort! trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Loop ◈ or Magic Sort!? v
Magic Sort! earns about $1.25M per month, while Loop ◈ earns about $8. That is a 156178.8× revenue gap (~$1.25M more per month for Magic Sort!). Annual revenue: Loop ◈ ≈ $94/year, Magic Sort! ≈ $14.99M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Loop ◈ or Magic Sort!? v
Magic Sort! leads with about 62.9M estimated downloads vs 600 for Loop ◈ - a 104831.5× gap. Loop ◈'s App Store downloads are estimated from 12 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Magic Sort!'s App Store downloads are estimated from 419K ratings.
Are Loop ◈ and Magic Sort! in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Games category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Loop ◈ and Magic Sort! offer? v
Loop ◈: no IAP detected on the public listing. Magic Sort!: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Loop ◈ runs a "Paid app ($0.49)" monetization model; Magic Sort! runs "Free casual game · ads + tiny sub take (~$0.08/MAU) · calibrated by US grossing rank #73". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Loop ◈ or Magic Sort!? v
Magic Sort! edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.0 (gap of 0.7 stars). Rating volume: Loop ◈ 12 ratings, Magic Sort! 419K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Loop ◈ vs Magic Sort! revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $8 for Loop ◈ and $1.25M for Magic Sort! are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Games) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Loop ◈ or Magic Sort! to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
