M&S - Fashion, Food & Homeware vs Target: Shop. Style. Save.
M&S - Fashion, Food & Homeware
Marks and Spencer plc
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 289K installs
VS
Target: Shop. Style. Save.
Target
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 601.5M installs
Revenue winnerTied
Installs winner
Target: Shop. Style. Save. wins
+208114% vs other
MAU winner
Target: Shop. Style. Save. wins
+16874% vs other
Rating winner
Target: Shop. Style. Save. wins
+2% vs other
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
M&S - Fashion, Food & Homeware
vs
Target: Shop. Style. Save.
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
=
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
=
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
289K
▶
601.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
53K
▶
9.0M
App Store rating
4.81★
▶
4.90★
Total ratings
4K
▶
6.7M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Shopping
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 3, 2012
- Last updated
- Apr 24, 2026
- File size
- 132.1 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 8.60.1
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Shopping
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 25, 2008
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- 302.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2026.17.0
- Languages
- English
M&S - Fashion, Food & Homeware trajectory
Target: Shop. Style. Save. trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, M&S - Fashion, Food & Homeware or Target: Shop. Style. Save.? v
Target: Shop. Style. Save. earns about $0 per month, while M&S - Fashion, Food & Homeware earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: M&S - Fashion, Food & Homeware ≈ $0/year, Target: Shop. Style. Save. ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, M&S - Fashion, Food & Homeware or Target: Shop. Style. Save.? v
Target: Shop. Style. Save. leads with about 601.5M estimated downloads vs 289K for M&S - Fashion, Food & Homeware - a 2082.1× gap. M&S - Fashion, Food & Homeware's App Store downloads are estimated from 4K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Target: Shop. Style. Save.'s App Store downloads are estimated from 6.7M ratings.
Are M&S - Fashion, Food & Homeware and Target: Shop. Style. Save. in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Shopping category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do M&S - Fashion, Food & Homeware and Target: Shop. Style. Save. have in-app purchases? v
M&S - Fashion, Food & Homeware does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Target: Shop. Style. Save. does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: M&S - Fashion, Food & Homeware runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Target: Shop. Style. Save. runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, M&S - Fashion, Food & Homeware or Target: Shop. Style. Save.? v
Target: Shop. Style. Save. edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: M&S - Fashion, Food & Homeware 4K ratings, Target: Shop. Style. Save. 6.7M ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these M&S - Fashion, Food & Homeware vs Target: Shop. Style. Save. revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for M&S - Fashion, Food & Homeware and $0 for Target: Shop. Style. Save. are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Shopping) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare M&S - Fashion, Food & Homeware or Target: Shop. Style. Save. to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.