MacroFactor - Macro Tracker vs Nutrition & Calorie Tracker
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Stronger By Science Technologies LLC
Google Play
$102.0K/mo
~$1.22M/yr · 1.4M installs
VS
Nutrition & Calorie Tracker
PLHGlobal
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 428K installs
Revenue winner
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins
+10199500% vs other
Installs winner
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins
+222% vs other
MAU winner
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins
+134% vs other
Rating winner
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins
+33% vs other
Why MacroFactor - Macro Tracker is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- MacroFactor - Macro Tracker earns roughly 101995× more per month than Nutrition & Calorie Tracker - $102.0K vs $0.
- Subscription model. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker runs a $11.99/mo subscription that compounds; Nutrition & Calorie Tracker relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker has ~1.4M lifetime installs vs Nutrition & Calorie Tracker's ~428K - 3.2× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker sits at 4.84★ vs 3.63★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full MacroFactor - Macro Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
vs
Nutrition & Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$102.0K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.22M
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.4M
◀
428K
Monthly active users (est.)?
179K
◀
77K
App Store rating
4.84★
◀
3.63★
Total ratings
15K
◀
876
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$11.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 14, 2021
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone 10+
- Version
- 5.7.9
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 9, 2026
- Last updated
- Jun 25, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.0.7
- Languages
- -
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker trajectory
Nutrition & Calorie Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker or Nutrition & Calorie Tracker? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker earns about $102.0K per month, while Nutrition & Calorie Tracker earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$102.0K more per month for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker). Annual revenue: MacroFactor - Macro Tracker ≈ $1.22M/year, Nutrition & Calorie Tracker ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker or Nutrition & Calorie Tracker? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker leads with about 1.4M estimated downloads vs 428K for Nutrition & Calorie Tracker - a 3.2× gap. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Nutrition & Calorie Tracker reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are MacroFactor - Macro Tracker and Nutrition & Calorie Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do MacroFactor - Macro Tracker and Nutrition & Calorie Tracker offer? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker: IAP range $9.99 - $89.99 per item. Nutrition & Calorie Tracker: no IAP detected on the public listing. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$11.99/mo)" monetization model; Nutrition & Calorie Tracker runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker or Nutrition & Calorie Tracker? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 3.6 (gap of 1.2 stars). Rating volume: MacroFactor - Macro Tracker 2K ratings, Nutrition & Calorie Tracker 6 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these MacroFactor - Macro Tracker vs Nutrition & Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $102.0K for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker and $0 for Nutrition & Calorie Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare MacroFactor - Macro Tracker or Nutrition & Calorie Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.