MacroFactor - Macro Tracker vs Sweat: Fitness App For Women
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Stronger By Science Technologies LLC
Google Play
$102.0K/mo
~$1.22M/yr · 1.4M installs
VS
Sweat: Fitness App For Women
Sweat
Google Play
$437.3K/mo
~$5.25M/yr · 10.2M installs
Revenue winner
Sweat: Fitness App For Women wins
+329% vs other
Installs winner
Sweat: Fitness App For Women wins
+638% vs other
MAU winner
Sweat: Fitness App For Women wins
+332% vs other
Rating winner
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins
+11% vs other
Why Sweat: Fitness App For Women is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Sweat: Fitness App For Women earns roughly 4× more per month than MacroFactor - Macro Tracker - $437.3K vs $102.0K.
- Aggressive pricing. Sweat: Fitness App For Women undercuts at $11.56/mo vs $11.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Sweat: Fitness App For Women has ~10.2M lifetime installs vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker's ~1.4M - 7.4× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Sweat: Fitness App For Women report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
vs
Sweat: Fitness App For Women
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$102.0K
▶
$437.3K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.22M
▶
$5.25M
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.4M
▶
10.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
179K
▶
773K
App Store rating
4.84★
◀
4.38★
Total ratings
15K
▶
39K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$11.99
◀
$11.56
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 14, 2021
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone 10+
- Version
- 5.7.9
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 28, 2016
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 7.8
- Languages
- -
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker trajectory
Sweat: Fitness App For Women trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker or Sweat: Fitness App For Women? v
Sweat: Fitness App For Women earns about $437.3K per month, while MacroFactor - Macro Tracker earns about $102.0K. That is a 4.3× revenue gap (~$335.2K more per month for Sweat: Fitness App For Women). Annual revenue: MacroFactor - Macro Tracker ≈ $1.22M/year, Sweat: Fitness App For Women ≈ $5.25M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker or Sweat: Fitness App For Women? v
Sweat: Fitness App For Women leads with about 10.2M estimated downloads vs 1.4M for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker - a 7.4× gap. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Sweat: Fitness App For Women reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are MacroFactor - Macro Tracker and Sweat: Fitness App For Women in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do MacroFactor - Macro Tracker and Sweat: Fitness App For Women offer? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker: IAP range $9.99 - $89.99 per item. Sweat: Fitness App For Women: IAP range $0.99 - $134.99 per item. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$11.99/mo)" monetization model; Sweat: Fitness App For Women runs "Subscription (~$11.56/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker or Sweat: Fitness App For Women? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.5 stars). Rating volume: MacroFactor - Macro Tracker 2K ratings, Sweat: Fitness App For Women 3K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these MacroFactor - Macro Tracker vs Sweat: Fitness App For Women revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $102.0K for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker and $437.3K for Sweat: Fitness App For Women are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare MacroFactor - Macro Tracker or Sweat: Fitness App For Women to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.