MacroFactor - Macro Tracker vs Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner

MacroFactor - Macro Tracker

Stronger By Science Technologies LLC
Google Play
$102.0K/mo
~$1.22M/yr · 1.4M installs
VS

Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner

Yuka App
Google Play
$1.84M/mo
~$22.07M/yr · 41.7M installs
Revenue winner Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins +1703% vs other
Installs winner Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins +2930% vs other
MAU winner Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins +1694% vs other
Rating winner MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins +2% vs other

Why Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner earns roughly 18× more per month than MacroFactor - Macro Tracker - $1.84M vs $102.0K.
  2. Premium pricing. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner charges $14.14/mo vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker's $11.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner has ~41.7M lifetime installs vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker's ~1.4M - 30.3× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
vs
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$102.0K
$1.84M
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.22M
$22.07M
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.4M
41.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
179K
3.2M
App Store rating
4.84★
4.72★
Total ratings
15K
183K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$11.99
$14.14
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

MacroFactor - Macro Tracker

Stronger By Science Technologies LLC
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Sep 14, 2021
Last updated
Jul 2, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone 10+
Version
5.7.9
Languages
-
View full MacroFactor - Macro Tracker report →

Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner

Yuka App
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Dec 2, 2019
Last updated
Jul 1, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
4.60.1
Languages
-
View full Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner report →

MacroFactor - Macro Tracker trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

FAQ

Which makes more money, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker or Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner earns about $1.84M per month, while MacroFactor - Macro Tracker earns about $102.0K. That is a 18.0× revenue gap (~$1.74M more per month for Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner). Annual revenue: MacroFactor - Macro Tracker ≈ $1.22M/year, Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner ≈ $22.07M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker or Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner leads with about 41.7M estimated downloads vs 1.4M for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker - a 30.3× gap. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are MacroFactor - Macro Tracker and Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do MacroFactor - Macro Tracker and Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner offer? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker: IAP range $9.99 - $89.99 per item. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner: IAP range $10.00 - $20.00 per item. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$11.99/mo)" monetization model; Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner runs "Subscription (~$14.14/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker or Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: MacroFactor - Macro Tracker 2K ratings, Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner 10K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these MacroFactor - Macro Tracker vs Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $102.0K for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker and $1.84M for Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare MacroFactor - Macro Tracker or Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.