MacroFactor - Macro Tracker vs Cronometer: Calorie Counter
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Stronger By Science Technologies LLC
App Store
$75.3K/mo
~$903.7K/yr · 1.5M installs
VS
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
Cronometer Software Inc.
Google Play
$464.6K/mo
~$5.58M/yr · 5.4M installs
Revenue winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+517% vs other
Installs winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+265% vs other
MAU winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+102% vs other
Rating winner
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins
+4% vs other
Why Cronometer: Calorie Counter is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cronometer: Calorie Counter earns roughly 6× more per month than MacroFactor - Macro Tracker - $464.6K vs $75.3K.
- Premium pricing. Cronometer: Calorie Counter charges $16.40/mo vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker's $9.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Cronometer: Calorie Counter has ~5.4M lifetime installs vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker's ~1.5M - 3.6× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cronometer: Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
vs
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$75.3K
▶
$464.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$903.7K
▶
$5.58M
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.5M
▶
5.4M
Monthly active users (est.)?
389K
▶
785K
App Store rating
4.81★
◀
4.63★
Total ratings
14K
▶
53K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
▶
$16.40
IAP tiers detected
6 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 15, 2021
- Last updated
- Apr 1, 2026
- File size
- 241.1 MB
- Content rating
- 9+
- Version
- 5.7.6
- Languages
- English, Japanese
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 13, 2016
- Last updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker trajectory
Cronometer: Calorie Counter trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker or Cronometer: Calorie Counter? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter earns about $464.6K per month, while MacroFactor - Macro Tracker earns about $75.3K. That is a 6.2× revenue gap (~$389.3K more per month for Cronometer: Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: MacroFactor - Macro Tracker ≈ $903.7K/year, Cronometer: Calorie Counter ≈ $5.58M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker or Cronometer: Calorie Counter? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter leads with about 5.4M estimated downloads vs 1.5M for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker - a 3.6× gap. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 14K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Cronometer: Calorie Counter reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are MacroFactor - Macro Tracker and Cronometer: Calorie Counter in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do MacroFactor - Macro Tracker and Cronometer: Calorie Counter offer? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker: IAP range 6 tiers detected. Cronometer: Calorie Counter: IAP range $2.99 - $89.99 per item. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$6.00/mo)" monetization model; Cronometer: Calorie Counter runs "Subscription (~$16.40/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker or Cronometer: Calorie Counter? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: MacroFactor - Macro Tracker 14K ratings, Cronometer: Calorie Counter 8K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these MacroFactor - Macro Tracker vs Cronometer: Calorie Counter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $75.3K for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker and $464.6K for Cronometer: Calorie Counter are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare MacroFactor - Macro Tracker or Cronometer: Calorie Counter to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.