Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
Viral Development LLC
App Store
$3.16M/mo
~$37.96M/yr · 14.9M installs
VS
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
MacrosFirst, Inc.
App Store
$106.8K/mo
~$1.28M/yr · 628K installs
Revenue winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+2861% vs other
Installs winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+2278% vs other
MAU winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+1678% vs other
Rating winner
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker wins
+1% vs other
Why Cal AI - Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns roughly 30× more per month than MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker - $3.16M vs $106.8K.
- Premium pricing. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker charges $19.99/mo vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker's $11.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker has ~14.9M lifetime installs vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker's ~628K - 23.8× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs 3 IAP tiers vs 1 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cal AI - Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
vs
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$3.16M
◀
$106.8K
Annual revenue (est.)
$37.96M
◀
$1.28M
Lifetime installs (est.)
14.9M
◀
628K
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.3M
◀
184K
App Store rating
4.80★
▶
4.86★
Total ratings
332K
◀
18K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
◀
$11.99
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
◀
1 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 8, 2024
- Last updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- File size
- 307.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 26.24.0
- Languages
- Arabic, AZ, Dutch, English, French, German +9 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 19, 2017
- Last updated
- Jun 9, 2026
- File size
- 178.2 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 2.1.645
- Languages
- English
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker trajectory
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns about $3.16M per month, while MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker earns about $106.8K. That is a 29.6× revenue gap (~$3.06M more per month for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker ≈ $37.96M/year, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker ≈ $1.28M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker leads with about 14.9M estimated downloads vs 628K for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker - a 23.8× gap. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 332K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 18K ratings.
Are Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker offer? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker: IAP range 3 tiers detected. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker runs "Subscription (~$11.99/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker 332K ratings, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker 18K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $3.16M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and $106.8K for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.