MActivePro vs Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet
MActivePro
Shenzhen Horn Big Data Software Co.,Ltd
App Store
$775/mo
~$9.3K/yr · 17K installs
VS
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet
Fitia Technologies
Google Play
$698.4K/mo
~$8.38M/yr · 14.0M installs
Revenue winner
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet wins
+90013% vs other
Installs winner
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet wins
+80960% vs other
MAU winner
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet wins
+30647% vs other
Rating winner
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet wins
+47% vs other
Why Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet earns roughly 901× more per month than MActivePro - $698.4K vs $775.
- Premium pricing. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet charges $9.44/mo vs MActivePro's $2.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet has ~14.0M lifetime installs vs MActivePro's ~17K - 810.6× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet sits at 4.85★ vs 3.30★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$775
▶
$698.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$9.3K
▶
$8.38M
Lifetime installs (est.)
17K
▶
14.0M
Monthly active users (est.)?
4K
▶
1.2M
App Store rating
3.30★
▶
4.85★
Total ratings
345
▶
402K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$2.99
▶
$9.44
IAP tiers detected
10 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 14, 2022
- Last updated
- Jun 10, 2026
- File size
- 462.8 MB
- Content rating
- 9+
- Version
- 1.9.4
- Languages
- Arabic, HY, Czech, Dutch, English, Finnish +22 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 17, 2019
- Last updated
- Jul 1, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 24.1.13
- Languages
- -
MActivePro trajectory
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, MActivePro or Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet? v
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet earns about $698.4K per month, while MActivePro earns about $775. That is a 901.1× revenue gap (~$697.6K more per month for Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet). Annual revenue: MActivePro ≈ $9.3K/year, Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet ≈ $8.38M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, MActivePro or Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet? v
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet leads with about 14.0M estimated downloads vs 17K for MActivePro - a 810.6× gap. MActivePro's App Store downloads are estimated from 344 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are MActivePro and Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do MActivePro and Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet offer? v
MActivePro: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet: IAP range $0.99 - $89.99 per item. MActivePro runs a "Subscription (~$5.99/mo)" monetization model; Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet runs "Subscription (~$9.44/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, MActivePro or Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet? v
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 3.3 (gap of 1.6 stars). Rating volume: MActivePro 344 ratings, Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet 951 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these MActivePro vs Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $775 for MActivePro and $698.4K for Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare MActivePro or Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
