Magic Research vs Piggy Clicker
Magic Research
Maticolotto
Google Play
$5.8K/mo
~$69.8K/yr · 122K installs
VS
Piggy Clicker
株式会社EAGLE
Google Play
$6.3K/mo
~$75.8K/yr · 1.0M installs
Revenue winner
Piggy Clicker wins
+9% vs other
Installs winner
Piggy Clicker wins
+749% vs other
MAU winner
Piggy Clicker wins
+450% vs other
Rating winner
Magic Research wins
+13% vs other
Why Piggy Clicker is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Subscription model. Piggy Clicker runs a $9.17/mo subscription that compounds; Magic Research relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Piggy Clicker has ~1.0M lifetime installs vs Magic Research's ~122K - 8.5× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Piggy Clicker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$5.8K
▶
$6.3K
Annual revenue (est.)
$69.8K
▶
$75.8K
Lifetime installs (est.)
122K
▶
1.0M
Monthly active users (est.)?
11K
▶
59K
App Store rating
4.67★
◀
4.13★
Total ratings
2K
▶
19K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$9.17
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Simulation
- Price
- USD3.99
- Released
- Jan 25, 2023
- Last updated
- Oct 17, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.15.12
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Simulation
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 30, 2017
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 24.13
- Languages
- -
Magic Research trajectory
Piggy Clicker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Magic Research or Piggy Clicker? v
Piggy Clicker earns about $6.3K per month, while Magic Research earns about $5.8K. That is a 1.1× revenue gap (~$496 more per month for Piggy Clicker). Annual revenue: Magic Research ≈ $69.8K/year, Piggy Clicker ≈ $75.8K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Magic Research or Piggy Clicker? v
Piggy Clicker leads with about 1.0M estimated downloads vs 122K for Magic Research - a 8.5× gap. Magic Research reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play. Piggy Clicker reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Magic Research and Piggy Clicker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Simulation category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Magic Research and Piggy Clicker offer? v
Magic Research: no IAP detected on the public listing. Piggy Clicker: IAP range $0.99 - $84.99 per item. Magic Research runs a "Paid app ($3.99)" monetization model; Piggy Clicker runs "Free game · IAP-driven (0 packs, ~$0.30/MAU)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Magic Research or Piggy Clicker? v
Magic Research edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.1 (gap of 0.5 stars). Rating volume: Magic Research 385 ratings, Piggy Clicker 6 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Magic Research vs Piggy Clicker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $5.8K for Magic Research and $6.3K for Piggy Clicker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Simulation) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Magic Research or Piggy Clicker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
