熟汝クラブMango vs note(ノート)

熟汝クラブMango

完熟マンゴートーク事務局
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 51K installs
VS

note(ノート)

note inc.
Google Play
$62.6K/mo
~$750.7K/yr · 1.1M installs
Revenue winner note(ノート) wins +6256200% vs other
Installs winner note(ノート) wins +1999% vs other
MAU winner note(ノート) wins +994% vs other
Rating winner note(ノート) wins +453% vs other

Why note(ノート) is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. note(ノート) earns roughly 62562× more per month than 熟汝クラブMango - $62.6K vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. note(ノート) runs a $16.20/mo subscription that compounds; 熟汝クラブMango relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. note(ノート) has ~1.1M lifetime installs vs 熟汝クラブMango's ~51K - 21.0× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. note(ノート) sits at 4.53★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full note(ノート) report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

熟汝クラブMango
vs
note(ノート)
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
$62.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
$750.7K
Lifetime installs (est.)
51K
1.1M
Monthly active users (est.)?
22K
238K
App Store rating
-
4.53★
Total ratings
0
8K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
$16.20
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

熟汝クラブMango

完熟マンゴートーク事務局
Google Play
Category
Social
Price
Free
Released
-
Last updated
Dec 11, 2025
File size
-
Content rating
Mature 17+
Version
2.0.0
Languages
-
View full 熟汝クラブMango report →

note(ノート)

note inc.
Google Play
Category
Social
Price
Free
Released
Oct 20, 2014
Last updated
May 1, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Teen
Version
10.7.0
Languages
-
View full note(ノート) report →

熟汝クラブMango trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

note(ノート) trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, 熟汝クラブMango or note(ノート)? v
note(ノート) earns about $62.6K per month, while 熟汝クラブMango earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$62.6K more per month for note(ノート)). Annual revenue: 熟汝クラブMango ≈ $0/year, note(ノート) ≈ $750.7K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, 熟汝クラブMango or note(ノート)? v
note(ノート) leads with about 1.1M estimated downloads vs 51K for 熟汝クラブMango - a 21.0× gap. 熟汝クラブMango reports 50,000+ installs on Google Play. note(ノート) reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are 熟汝クラブMango and note(ノート) in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Social category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do 熟汝クラブMango and note(ノート) offer? v
熟汝クラブMango: no IAP detected on the public listing. note(ノート): IAP range $0.99 - $264.99 per item. 熟汝クラブMango runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; note(ノート) runs "Subscription (~$16.20/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, 熟汝クラブMango or note(ノート)? v
note(ノート) edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.5 stars). Rating volume: 熟汝クラブMango 0 ratings, note(ノート) 2 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these 熟汝クラブMango vs note(ノート) revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for 熟汝クラブMango and $62.6K for note(ノート) are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Social) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare 熟汝クラブMango or note(ノート) to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.