Maps Altimeter vs Qibla Finder for Wear OS
Maps Altimeter
Amphebia
Google Play
$29/mo
~$352/yr · 1K installs
VS
Qibla Finder for Wear OS
Limoo
Google Play
$6/mo
~$69/yr · 485 installs
Revenue winner
Maps Altimeter wins
+383% vs other
Installs winner
Maps Altimeter wins
+153% vs other
MAU winner
Maps Altimeter wins
+272% vs other
Rating winner
Maps Altimeter wins
+344% vs other
Why Maps Altimeter is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Maps Altimeter earns roughly 5× more per month than Qibla Finder for Wear OS - $29 vs $6.
- Bigger install base. Maps Altimeter has ~1K lifetime installs vs Qibla Finder for Wear OS's ~485 - 2.5× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Maps Altimeter sits at 3.44★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Maps Altimeter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$29
◀
$6
Annual revenue (est.)
$352
◀
$69
Lifetime installs (est.)
1K
◀
485
Monthly active users (est.)?
203.682
◀
54.805
App Store rating
3.44★
◀
-
Total ratings
46
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Travel & Local
- Price
- USD1.99
- Released
- Jun 24, 2017
- Last updated
- Jul 24, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 6.5
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Travel & Local
- Price
- USD0.99
- Released
- Jul 18, 2023
- Last updated
- Oct 5, 2023
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 3.3
- Languages
- -
Maps Altimeter trajectory
Qibla Finder for Wear OS trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Maps Altimeter or Qibla Finder for Wear OS? v
Maps Altimeter earns about $29 per month, while Qibla Finder for Wear OS earns about $6. That is a 4.8× revenue gap (~$23 more per month for Maps Altimeter). Annual revenue: Maps Altimeter ≈ $352/year, Qibla Finder for Wear OS ≈ $69/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Maps Altimeter or Qibla Finder for Wear OS? v
Maps Altimeter leads with about 1K estimated downloads vs 485 for Qibla Finder for Wear OS - a 2.5× gap. Maps Altimeter reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play. Qibla Finder for Wear OS reports 100+ installs on Google Play.
Are Maps Altimeter and Qibla Finder for Wear OS in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel & Local category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Maps Altimeter and Qibla Finder for Wear OS have in-app purchases? v
Maps Altimeter does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Qibla Finder for Wear OS does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Maps Altimeter runs "Paid app ($1.99)", Qibla Finder for Wear OS runs "Paid app ($0.99)".
Which has better ratings, Maps Altimeter or Qibla Finder for Wear OS? v
Maps Altimeter edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 3.4 stars). Rating volume: Maps Altimeter 9 ratings, Qibla Finder for Wear OS 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Maps Altimeter vs Qibla Finder for Wear OS revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $29 for Maps Altimeter and $6 for Qibla Finder for Wear OS are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel & Local) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Maps Altimeter or Qibla Finder for Wear OS to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
