Looper! vs Marble Sort!
Looper!
Kwalee Ltd
App Store
$368.6K/mo
~$4.42M/yr · 46.1M installs
VS
Marble Sort!
Voodoo
App Store
$130.9K/mo
~$1.57M/yr · 2.3M installs
Revenue winner
Looper! wins
+182% vs other
Installs winner
Looper! wins
+1862% vs other
MAU winner
Looper! wins
+1369% vs other
Rating winner
Marble Sort! wins
+0% vs other
Why Looper! is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Looper! earns roughly 3× more per month than Marble Sort! - $368.6K vs $130.9K.
- Subscription model. Looper! runs a $14.49/mo subscription that compounds; Marble Sort! relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Looper! has ~46.1M lifetime installs vs Marble Sort!'s ~2.3M - 19.6× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Looper! report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Looper!
vs
Marble Sort!
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$368.6K
◀
$130.9K
Annual revenue (est.)
$4.42M
◀
$1.57M
Lifetime installs (est.)
46.1M
◀
2.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
6.9M
◀
467K
App Store rating
4.65★
▶
4.66★
Total ratings
307K
◀
19K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$14.49
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
6 tiers
▶
10 tiers
- Category
- Games
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 7, 2018
- Last updated
- Dec 2, 2025
- File size
- 238.1 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 1.9.7
- Languages
- Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Italian +10 more
- Category
- Games
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 28, 2025
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- 363.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.11.01
- Languages
- Arabic, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese +5 more
Looper! trajectory
Marble Sort! trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Looper! or Marble Sort!? v
Looper! earns about $368.6K per month, while Marble Sort! earns about $130.9K. That is a 2.8× revenue gap (~$237.7K more per month for Looper!). Annual revenue: Looper! ≈ $4.42M/year, Marble Sort! ≈ $1.57M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Looper! or Marble Sort!? v
Looper! leads with about 46.1M estimated downloads vs 2.3M for Marble Sort! - a 19.6× gap. Looper!'s App Store downloads are estimated from 307K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Marble Sort!'s App Store downloads are estimated from 19K ratings.
Are Looper! and Marble Sort! in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Games category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Looper! and Marble Sort! offer? v
Looper!: IAP range 6 tiers detected. Marble Sort!: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Looper! runs a "Free casual game · ads + tiny sub take (~$0.08/MAU)" monetization model; Marble Sort! runs "Free game · IAP-driven (10 packs, ~$0.35/MAU)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Looper! or Marble Sort!? v
Marble Sort! edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Looper! 307K ratings, Marble Sort! 19K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Looper! vs Marble Sort! revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $368.6K for Looper! and $130.9K for Marble Sort! are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Games) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Looper! or Marble Sort! to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.