Marco Polo - Video Messenger vs QQ邮箱
Marco Polo - Video Messenger
Joya Communications
App Store
$6.78M/mo
~$81.39M/yr · 366.0M installs
VS
QQ邮箱
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
App Store
$2.9K/mo
~$34.9K/yr · 36K installs
Revenue winner
Marco Polo - Video Messenger wins
+232970% vs other
Installs winner
Marco Polo - Video Messenger wins
+1005284% vs other
MAU winner
Marco Polo - Video Messenger wins
+263128% vs other
Rating winner
Marco Polo - Video Messenger wins
+34% vs other
Why Marco Polo - Video Messenger is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Marco Polo - Video Messenger earns roughly 2331× more per month than QQ邮箱 - $6.78M vs $2.9K.
- Premium pricing. Marco Polo - Video Messenger charges $19.99/mo vs QQ邮箱's $8.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Marco Polo - Video Messenger has ~366.0M lifetime installs vs QQ邮箱's ~36K - 10053.8× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Marco Polo - Video Messenger sits at 4.76★ vs 3.56★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Marco Polo - Video Messenger report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Marco Polo - Video Messenger
vs
QQ邮箱
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$6.78M
◀
$2.9K
Annual revenue (est.)
$81.39M
◀
$34.9K
Lifetime installs (est.)
366.0M
◀
36K
Monthly active users (est.)?
26.3M
◀
10K
App Store rating
4.76★
◀
3.56★
Total ratings
2.2M
◀
728
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
◀
$8.99
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
▶
7 tiers
- Category
- Social Networking
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 7, 2014
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- 216.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 0.1581.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Productivity
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 24, 2011
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- 173.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 7.1.6
- Languages
- English, Chinese, Chinese
Marco Polo - Video Messenger trajectory
QQ邮箱 trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Marco Polo - Video Messenger or QQ邮箱? v
Marco Polo - Video Messenger earns about $6.78M per month, while QQ邮箱 earns about $2.9K. That is a 2330.7× revenue gap (~$6.78M more per month for Marco Polo - Video Messenger). Annual revenue: Marco Polo - Video Messenger ≈ $81.39M/year, QQ邮箱 ≈ $34.9K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Marco Polo - Video Messenger or QQ邮箱? v
Marco Polo - Video Messenger leads with about 366.0M estimated downloads vs 36K for QQ邮箱 - a 10053.8× gap. Marco Polo - Video Messenger's App Store downloads are estimated from 2.2M ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. QQ邮箱's App Store downloads are estimated from 728 ratings.
Are Marco Polo - Video Messenger and QQ邮箱 in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
No - Marco Polo - Video Messenger is in Social Networking and QQ邮箱 is in Productivity. They share screen-time attention but earn money in different niches: Marco Polo - Video Messenger from social networking monetization patterns, QQ邮箱 from productivity.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Marco Polo - Video Messenger and QQ邮箱 offer? v
Marco Polo - Video Messenger: IAP range 4 tiers detected. QQ邮箱: IAP range 7 tiers detected. Marco Polo - Video Messenger runs a "Subscription (~$7.99/mo)" monetization model; QQ邮箱 runs "Subscription (~$8.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Marco Polo - Video Messenger or QQ邮箱? v
Marco Polo - Video Messenger edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 3.6 (gap of 1.2 stars). Rating volume: Marco Polo - Video Messenger 2.2M ratings, QQ邮箱 728 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Marco Polo - Video Messenger vs QQ邮箱 revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $6.78M for Marco Polo - Video Messenger and $2.9K for QQ邮箱 are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Social Networking / Productivity) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Marco Polo - Video Messenger or QQ邮箱 to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.