Massive Dev Chart Timer vs PhotoPills
Massive Dev Chart Timer
Freestyle Photo & Imaging
Google Play
$3.2K/mo
~$38.6K/yr · 27K installs
VS
PhotoPills
PhotoPills, SL
Google Play
$56.2K/mo
~$674.2K/yr · 426K installs
Revenue winner
PhotoPills wins
+1646% vs other
Installs winner
PhotoPills wins
+1488% vs other
MAU winner
PhotoPills wins
+1151% vs other
Rating winner
PhotoPills wins
+16% vs other
Why PhotoPills is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- PhotoPills earns roughly 17× more per month than Massive Dev Chart Timer - $56.2K vs $3.2K.
- Bigger install base. PhotoPills has ~426K lifetime installs vs Massive Dev Chart Timer's ~27K - 15.9× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. PhotoPills sits at 4.76★ vs 4.09★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full PhotoPills report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Massive Dev Chart Timer
vs
PhotoPills
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$3.2K
▶
$56.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$38.6K
▶
$674.2K
Lifetime installs (est.)
27K
▶
426K
Monthly active users (est.)?
8K
▶
101K
App Store rating
4.09★
▶
4.76★
Total ratings
537
▶
8K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- USD9.99
- Released
- Jul 18, 2011
- Last updated
- Apr 3, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 4.6.9
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- USD10.99
- Released
- May 26, 2017
- Last updated
- Apr 15, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.8.21
- Languages
- -
Massive Dev Chart Timer trajectory
PhotoPills trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Massive Dev Chart Timer or PhotoPills? v
PhotoPills earns about $56.2K per month, while Massive Dev Chart Timer earns about $3.2K. That is a 17.5× revenue gap (~$53.0K more per month for PhotoPills). Annual revenue: Massive Dev Chart Timer ≈ $38.6K/year, PhotoPills ≈ $674.2K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Massive Dev Chart Timer or PhotoPills? v
PhotoPills leads with about 426K estimated downloads vs 27K for Massive Dev Chart Timer - a 15.9× gap. Massive Dev Chart Timer reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play. PhotoPills reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Massive Dev Chart Timer and PhotoPills in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photography category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Massive Dev Chart Timer and PhotoPills have in-app purchases? v
Massive Dev Chart Timer does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. PhotoPills does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Massive Dev Chart Timer runs "Paid app ($9.99)", PhotoPills runs "Paid app ($10.99)".
Which has better ratings, Massive Dev Chart Timer or PhotoPills? v
PhotoPills edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.1 (gap of 0.7 stars). Rating volume: Massive Dev Chart Timer 63 ratings, PhotoPills 512 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Massive Dev Chart Timer vs PhotoPills revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $3.2K for Massive Dev Chart Timer and $56.2K for PhotoPills are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photography) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Massive Dev Chart Timer or PhotoPills to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.