麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 vs Too Good To Go: End Food Waste

麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送

McDonald's (China) Co., Ltd.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 593K installs
VS

Too Good To Go: End Food Waste

Too Good To Go
App Store
$2.88M/mo
~$34.56M/yr · 75.6M installs
Revenue winner Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins +287975500% vs other
Installs winner Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins +12657% vs other
MAU winner Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins +5367% vs other
Rating winner Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins +2% vs other

Why Too Good To Go: End Food Waste is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns roughly 2879755× more per month than 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 - $2.88M vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste runs a $10.00/mo subscription that compounds; 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste has ~75.6M lifetime installs vs 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送's ~593K - 127.6× the funnel top.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Too Good To Go: End Food Waste report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送
vs
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$2.88M
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$34.56M
Lifetime installs (est.)
593K
▶
75.6M
Monthly active users (est.)?
71K
▶
3.9M
App Store rating
4.84★
▶
4.93★
Total ratings
7K
▶
504K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$10.00
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送

McDonald's (China) Co., Ltd.
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Jan 25, 2016
Last updated
May 7, 2026
File size
111.9 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
7.0.33.0
Languages
English, Chinese
View full 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 report →

Too Good To Go: End Food Waste

Too Good To Go
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Dec 8, 2015
Last updated
May 5, 2026
File size
141.6 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
26.5.0
Languages
EU, Catalan, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +10 more
View full Too Good To Go: End Food Waste report →

麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Too Good To Go: End Food Waste trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 App Store page →Too Good To Go: End Food Waste App Store page →

Related comparisons

Fussy Toddler Recipes iOS vs Mcdonald S iOSMcdonald S iOS vs Meal Planner Amp Grocery List AndroidLove Manuela iOS vs Mcdonald S iOSDoordash Food Grocery More iOS vs Mcdonald S iOS7 Eleven Rewards Shopping iOS vs Mcdonald S iOSMcdonald S iOS vs Taco Bell Fast Food Delivery iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns about $2.88M per month, while 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$2.88M more per month for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste). Annual revenue: 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 ≈ $0/year, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste ≈ $34.56M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste leads with about 75.6M estimated downloads vs 593K for 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 - a 127.6× gap. 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送's App Store downloads are estimated from 7K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste's App Store downloads are estimated from 504K ratings.
Are 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 and Too Good To Go: End Food Waste in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 and Too Good To Go: End Food Waste have in-app purchases? v
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Too Good To Go: End Food Waste runs "Subscription (~$10.00/mo, security)".
Which has better ratings, 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 7K ratings, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste 504K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 vs Too Good To Go: End Food Waste revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 and $2.88M for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.