MD307 Digital watch face vs MFT WF 12
MD307 Digital watch face
Matteo Dini MD ® Watch Faces
Google Play
$8.1K/mo
~$96.9K/yr · 307K installs
VS
MFT WF 12
mft watchface
Google Play
$45/mo
~$537/yr · 4K installs
Revenue winner
MD307 Digital watch face wins
+17838% vs other
Installs winner
MD307 Digital watch face wins
+8047% vs other
MAU winner
MD307 Digital watch face wins
+7133% vs other
Rating winner
MD307 Digital watch face wins
+0% vs other
Why MD307 Digital watch face is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- MD307 Digital watch face earns roughly 179× more per month than MFT WF 12 - $8.1K vs $45.
- Bigger install base. MD307 Digital watch face has ~307K lifetime installs vs MFT WF 12's ~4K - 81.5× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full MD307 Digital watch face report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
MD307 Digital watch face
vs
MFT WF 12
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$8.1K
◀
$45
Annual revenue (est.)
$96.9K
◀
$537
Lifetime installs (est.)
307K
◀
4K
Monthly active users (est.)?
27K
◀
369.46
App Store rating
4.41★
◀
4.40★
Total ratings
13K
◀
86
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD2.19
- Released
- Nov 3, 2022
- Last updated
- Mar 2, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD0.99
- Released
- Apr 12, 2024
- Last updated
- Aug 3, 2024
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
MD307 Digital watch face trajectory
MFT WF 12 trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, MD307 Digital watch face or MFT WF 12? v
MD307 Digital watch face earns about $8.1K per month, while MFT WF 12 earns about $45. That is a 179.4× revenue gap (~$8.0K more per month for MD307 Digital watch face). Annual revenue: MD307 Digital watch face ≈ $96.9K/year, MFT WF 12 ≈ $537/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, MD307 Digital watch face or MFT WF 12? v
MD307 Digital watch face leads with about 307K estimated downloads vs 4K for MFT WF 12 - a 81.5× gap. MD307 Digital watch face reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play. MFT WF 12 reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are MD307 Digital watch face and MFT WF 12 in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Personalization category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do MD307 Digital watch face and MFT WF 12 have in-app purchases? v
MD307 Digital watch face does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. MFT WF 12 does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: MD307 Digital watch face runs "Paid app ($2.19)", MFT WF 12 runs "Paid app ($0.99)".
Which has better ratings, MD307 Digital watch face or MFT WF 12? v
MD307 Digital watch face edges ahead with ★ 4.4 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: MD307 Digital watch face 2K ratings, MFT WF 12 86 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these MD307 Digital watch face vs MFT WF 12 revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $8.1K for MD307 Digital watch face and $45 for MFT WF 12 are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Personalization) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare MD307 Digital watch face or MFT WF 12 to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.